ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2006
Games in clinical genetic counseling supervision.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Anxiety on Novice Genetic Counseling Students' Experience of Supervised Clinical Rotations.Journal of genetic counseling · 2016Article
- Measuring the Effectiveness of a Genetic Counseling Supervision Training Conference.Journal of genetic counseling · 2016Article
- Genetic Counseling Supervisors' Self-Efficacy for Select Clinical Supervision Competencies.Journal of genetic counseling · 2016Article
- Form Follows Function: A Model for Clinical Supervision of Genetic Counseling Students.Journal of genetic counseling · 2015Article
- The impact of supervision training on genetic counselor supervisory identity development.Journal of genetic counseling · 2014Article
- Effects of second language usage on genetic counseling training and supervision.Journal of genetic counseling · 2013Article
- Genetic counseling supervisor competencies: results of a Delphi study.Journal of genetic counseling · 2013Article
- An investigation of relationships among genetic counselors' supervision skills and multicultural counseling competence.Journal of genetic counseling · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Games are defined as ongoing series of complementary ulterior transactions that are superficially plausible but have a concealed motivation to maximize pay-offs and minimize penalties for the initiator. While some games are harmless and part of socialization, others are destructive. Destructive game-playing in clinical supervision, in which game-playing (initiated by either supervisors or students) interferes with a student's realization of internship goals, has been documented in some allied healthcare professions but has not yet been studied in genetic counseling. Genetic counselors and clinical supervisors of genetic counseling students were anonymously surveyed regarding their experiences with destructive game-playing. Results show that such games do occur in genetic counseling clinical supervision. Some games are the same or similar to ones previously described in other health-care professions; others may be unique to genetic counseling. The purpose of this paper is to document these games as a first step to facilitating dialogue, understanding and awareness of them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.