ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2007
Decreased response rates by the combination of histamine and IL-2 in melphalan-based isolated limb perfusion.
Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Histamine in cancer immunology and immunotherapy. Current status and new perspectives.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2021Review
- Isolated limb perfusion with melphalan and TNF-alpha in the treatment of extremity sarcoma.Current treatment options in oncology · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Histamine (Hi) combined to melphalan in a rat experimental model of isolated limb perfusion (ILP) for lower limb soft tissue sarcoma, resulted in overall response rates (OR) of 66%. Likewise, ILP with interleukin-2 (IL-2) resulted in OR of 67%, when combined to melphalan, in the same experimental model. In systemic immunotherapy, the combination of IL-2 and Hi has been used for solid tumor treatment based on immunomodulatory effects. In this study, we used our well-established ILP experimental model to evaluate whether the synergistic effect between the two drugs seen in the systemic setting, could further improve response rates in a loco-regional setting. Histological evaluation was done directly and 24 h after ILP. Melphalan uptake by tumor and muscle were measured. Hi and IL-2 together, combined to melphalan in the ILP led to OR of only 28%. Histology of tumors demonstrated partial loss of Hi-induced hemorrhagic effect when IL-2 was present. Melphalan accumulation in the tumor when both Hi and IL-2 were added (3.1-fold) was very similar to accumulation with Hi only (2.8-fold), or IL-2 only (3.5-fold) combined to melphalan. In vitro there was no synergy between the drugs. In conclusion there was a negative synergistic effect between IL-2 and Hi in the regional setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.