ArticleHuman genetics2006
Genetic characterization and fine mapping of susceptibility loci for sarcoidosis in African Americans on chromosome 5.
Article in Human genetics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Manifestations and Management of Fibrotic Pulmonary Sarcoidosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Maculopapular sarcoidosis: the importance of skin signs.Dermatology reports · 2023Article
- Sarcoidosis Epidemiology: Race Matters.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Review
- Article
- Association of Rad51 polymorphism with DNA repair in BRCA1 mutation carriers and sporadic breast cancer risk.BMC cancer · 2011Article
- The potential of the immunological markers of sarcoidosis in exhaled breath and peripheral blood as future diagnostic and monitoring techniques.Inflammopharmacology · 2011Review
- Genetics of sarcoidosis: candidate genes and genome scans.Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society · 2007Review
- Genetic predisposition to respiratory diseases: infiltrative lung diseases.Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Sarcoidosis, a systemic granulomatous disease, likely results from both environmental agents and genetic susceptibility. Sarcoidosis is more prevalent in women and, in the United States, African Americans are both more commonly and more severely affected than Caucasians. We report a follow up of the first genome scan for sarcoidosis susceptibility genes in African Americans. Both the genome scan and the present study comprise 229 African American nuclear families ascertained through two or more sibs with sarcoidosis. Regions studied included those which reached a significance in the genome scan of 0.01 (2p25, 5q11, 5q35, 9q34, 11p15 and 20q13), 0.05 (3p25 and 5p15-13) or which replicated previous findings (3p14-11). We performed genotyping with additional markers in the same families used in the genome scan. We examined multi-locus models for epistasis and performed model-based linkage analysis on subsets of the most linked families to characterize the underlying genetic model. The strongest signal was at marker D5S407 (P=0.005) on 5q11.2, using both full and half sibling pairs. Our results support, in an African American population, a sarcoidosis susceptibility gene on chromosome 5q11.2, and a gene protective for sarcoidosis on 5p15.2. These fine mapping results further prioritize the importance of candidate regions on chromosomes 2p25, 3p25, 5q35, 9q34, 11p15 and 20q13 for African Americans. Additionally, our results suggest joint action of the effects of putative genes on chromosome 3p14-11 and 5p15.2. We conclude that multiple susceptibility loci for sarcoidosis exist in African Americans and that some may have interdependent effects on disease pathogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.