ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2006
A new test for family-based association mapping with inbred lines from plant breeding programs.
Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The double round-robin population unravels the genetic architecture of grain size in barley.Journal of experimental botany · 2022Article
- Association analysis for agronomic traits in wheat under terminal heat stress.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2021Article
- Genetic Factors Underlying Single Fiber Quality in A-Genome Donor Asian Cotton (Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Genome-wide association study of Gossypium arboreum resistance to reniform nematode.BMC genetics · 2018Article
- Quantitative trait loci from identification to exploitation for crop improvement.Plant cell reports · 2017Review
- Family-based association mapping in crop species.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2013Review
- Article
- Mixed model association mapping for fusarium head blight resistance in tunisian-derived durum wheat populations.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Association mapping holds great promise for the detection of quantitative trait loci (QTL) in plant breeding populations. The main objectives of this study were to (1) adapt the quantitative pedigree disequilibrium test to typical pedigrees of inbred lines produced in plant breeding programs, (2) compare the newly developed quantitative inbred pedigree disequilibrium test (QIPDT) with the commonly employed logistic regression ratio test (LRRT), with respect to the power and type I error rate of QTL detection, and (3) demonstrate the use of the QIPDT by applying it to flowering data of European elite maize inbreds. QIPDT and LRRT were compared based on computer simulations modeling 55 years of hybrid maize breeding in Central Europe. Furthermore, we applied QIPDT to a cross-section of 49 European elite maize inbred lines genotyped with 722 amplified fragment length polymorphism markers and phenotyped in four environments for days to anthesis. Compared to LRRT, the power to detect QTL was higher with QIPDT when using data collected routinely in plant breeding programs. Application of QIPDT to the 49 European maize inbreds resulted in a significant (P < 0.05) association located at a position for which a consensus QTL was detected in a previous study. The results of our study suggested that QIPDT is a promising QTL detection method for data collected routinely in plant breeding programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16896707What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.