Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16895613›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2006

Cross genome comparisons of serine proteases in Arabidopsis and rice.

Lokesh P Tripathi, R Sowdhamini

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 186 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Regulation of mixotrophy inMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Proteins associated with the Arabidopsis thaliana plastid rhomboid-like protein RBL10.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lokesh P TripathiNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, GKVK Campus, Bellary Road, Bangalore 560 065, India. lokesh@ncbs.res.in
R Sowdhamini
National Centre for Biological Sciences · INTata Institute of Fundamental Research · IN

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSerine proteases are one of the largest groups of proteolytic enzymes found across all kingdoms of life and are associated with several essential physiological pathways. The availability of Arabidopsis thaliana and rice (Oryza sativa) genome sequences has permitted the identification and comparison of the repertoire of serine protease-like proteins in the two plant species.

resultsDespite the differences in genome sizes between Arabidopsis and rice, we identified a very similar number of serine protease-like proteins in the two plant species (206 and 222, respectively). Nearly 40% of the above sequences were identified as potential orthologues. Atypical members could be identified in the plant genomes for Deg, Clp, Lon, rhomboid proteases and species-specific members were observed for the highly populated subtilisin and serine carboxypeptidase families suggesting multiple lateral gene transfers. DegP proteases, prolyl oligopeptidases, Clp proteases and rhomboids share a significantly higher percentage orthology between the two genomes indicating substantial evolutionary divergence was set prior to speciation. Single domain architectures and paralogues for several putative subtilisins, serine carboxypeptidases and rhomboids suggest they may have been recruited for additional roles in secondary metabolism with spatial and temporal regulation. The analysis reveals some domain architectures unique to either or both of the plant species and some inactive proteases, like in rhomboids and Clp proteases, which could be involved in chaperone function.

conclusionThe systematic analysis of the serine protease-like proteins in the two plant species has provided some insight into the possible functional associations of previously uncharacterised serine protease-like proteins. Further investigation of these aspects may prove beneficial in our understanding of similar processes in commercially significant crop plant species.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantAmino Acid SequenceArabidopsisArabidopsis Proteinsbeta-LactamasesCarboxypeptidasesDrosophila ProteinsEndopeptidase ClpEndopeptidasesEvolution, MolecularGene DuplicationHeat-Shock ProteinsMembrane ProteinsMolecular Sequence DataNuclear Pore Complex ProteinsOryzaArabidopsis Proteinsbeta-LactamasesCarboxypeptidasesC-terminal processing peptidaseDegP proteaseDrosophila ProteinsEndopeptidase ClpEndopeptidasesHeat-Shock Proteinslysosomal Pro-X carboxypeptidaseMembrane ProteinsNuclear Pore Complex ProteinsPeptide HydrolasesPeriplasmic ProteinsProlyl Oligopeptidasesprotease IVProtease LaRho protein, Drosophilaserine carboxypeptidaseSerine EndopeptidasesSPPA protein, ArabidopsisSubtilisinstype I signal peptidase

Identifiers

PMID16895613
PMCPMC1560137
OpenAlexW2145831282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.