Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16894245›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2006

Management of global risk across the continuum of hypertensive heart disease.

Jan Basile

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jan BasileRalph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29401, USA. jan.basile@med.va.gov
Medical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification and management of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors are essential to help prevent CV disease and slow its progression. Long-term epidemiologic data show that hypertension is associated with a two- to four-fold increase in CV morbidity and mortality; moreover, antihypertensive therapy has been proven to significantly reduce the risk of CV events. Clinical trial data also suggest that different antihypertensive agents generally provide similar reductions in CV risks and outcomes. Beta blockers have historically played an integral role in hypertension treatment, particularly among patients at high CV risk; however, a recent meta-analysis, based primarily on the use of atenolol, found that beta blockers may provide less clinical benefit as initial therapy than other classes of antihypertensive agents. Beta blockers are heterogeneous, and atenolol data may not be representative of other beta blockers. Newer beta blockers, which provide both cardioselective beta1-adrenergic receptor blockade and endothelium-dependent vasodilation, may prove to be more effective in reducing CV morbidity and mortality. Intensive strategies to control global CV risk have been shown to significantly reduce CV events. The challenge remains to develop effective risk assessment tools to identify at-risk patients who often go undetected.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesHypertensionAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsBenzopyransClinical Trials as TopicEthanolaminesHumansNebivololRisk FactorsAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsBenzopyransEthanolaminesNebivolol

Identifiers

PMID16894245
PMCPMC8109718
OpenAlexW1978979179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.