Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16893950›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2006

Engineering a high-affinity methyl-CpG-binding protein.

Helle F Jørgensen, Karen Adie, Pascal Chaubert, Adrian P Bird

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Levels of base excision repair proteins in CD4Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2022
    Article
  4. Development and application of novel BiFC probes for cell sorting based on epigenetic modification.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Methylation multiplicity and its clinical values in cancer.Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. A Practical Guide to the Measurement and Analysis of DNA Methylation.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2019
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Single molecule and single cell epigenomics.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2015
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Helle F JørgensenThe Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, King's Buildings, Mayfield Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, UK. helle.jorgensen@csc.mrc.ac.uk
Karen Adie
Pascal Chaubert
Adrian P Bird

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Core members of the MBD protein family (MeCP2, MBD1, MBD2 and MBD4) share a methyl-CpG-binding domain that has a specific affinity for methylated CpG sites in double-stranded DNA. By multimerizing the MDB domain of Mbd1, we engineered a poly-MBD protein that displays methyl-CpG-specific binding in vitro with a dissociation constant that is >50-fold higher than that of a monomeric MBD. Poly-MBD proteins also localize to methylated foci in cells and can deliver a functional domain to reporter constructs in vivo. We propose that poly-MBD proteins are sensitive reagents for the detection of DNA methylation levels in isolated native DNA and for cytological detection of chromosomal CpG methylation.

Indexed as

CpG IslandsDNA MethylationAnimalsCell LineDNA-Binding ProteinsIndicators and ReagentsMiceProtein EngineeringProtein Structure, TertiaryRecombinant ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsIndicators and ReagentsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID16893950
PMCPMC1540740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.