Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16893458›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical education2006

Long-term impact of four different strategies for delivering an on-line curriculum about herbs and other dietary supplements.

Tiffany Beal, Kathi J Kemper, Paula Gardiner, Charles Woods

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical education, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Online Training in Mind-Body Therapies: Different Doses, Long-term Outcomes.Journal of evidence-based complementary & alternative medicine · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Herbal Medicine in Primary Healthcare in Germany: The Patient's Perspective.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2012
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tiffany BealPhysican Assistant Program, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA. tbeal@wfubmc.edu
Kathi J Kemper
Paula Gardiner
Charles Woods

Funding

Evaluating an Internet-Based Curriculum about HerbsR01LM007709 · NLM · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KEMPER, KATHI J · 2004 to 2005
$334k
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM007709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious research has shown that internet education can lead to short-term improvements in clinicians' knowledge, confidence and communication practices. We wished to better understand the duration of these improvements and whether different curriculum delivery strategies differed in affecting these improvements.

methodsAs previously described, we conducted a randomized control trial comparing four different strategies for delivering an e-curriculum about herbs and other dietary supplements (HDS) to clinicians. The four strategies were delivering the curriculum by: a) email over 10 weeks; b) email within one week; c) web-site over 10 weeks; d) web-site within one week. Participants were surveyed at baseline, immediately after the course and 6-10 months after completing the course (long-term). Long-term outcomes focused on clinicians' knowledge, confidence and communication practices.

resultsOf the 780 clinicians who completed the course, 385 (49%) completed the long-term survey. Completers and non-completers of the long-term survey had similar demographics and professional characteristics at baseline. There were statistically significant improvements from baseline to long-term follow-up in knowledge, confidence and communication practices; these improvements did not differ by curriculum delivery strategy. Knowledge scores improved from 67.7 +/- 10.3 at baseline to 78.8 +/- 12.3 at long-term follow-up (P < 0.001). Confidence scores improved from 53.7 +/- 17.8 at baseline to 66.9 +/- 12.0 at long term follow-up (P < 0.001); communication scores improved from 2.6 +/- 1.9 at baseline to 3.6 +/- 2.1 (P < 0.001) at long-term follow-up.

conclusionThis e- curriculum led to significant and sustained improvements in clinicians' expertise about HDS regardless of the delivery strategy. Future studies should compare the impact of required vs. elective courses and self-reported vs. objective measures of behavior change.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceDietary SupplementsInternetAdultCommunicationComputer-Assisted InstructionCurriculumEducation, DistanceEducation, Medical, ContinuingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHerbal MedicineHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient Relations

Identifiers

PMID16893458
PMCPMC1557850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.