Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16888668›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2006

Carving a niche: establishing bioinformatics collaborations.

Jennifer A Lyon, Michele R Tennant, Kevin R Messner, David L Osterbur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The emerging informationist specialty: a systematic review of the literature.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2008
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Alignment of library services with the research lifecycle.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Library-based clinical and translational research support.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2013
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Broad issues to consider for library involvement in bioinformatics.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2006
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jennifer A LyonResearch Informatics Consult Service, Eskind Biomedical Library, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, USA. jennifer.lyon@Vanderbilt.Edu
Michele R Tennant
Kevin R Messner
David L Osterbur

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe paper describes collaborations and partnerships developed between library bioinformatics programs and other bioinformatics-related units at four academic institutions.

methodsA call for information on bioinformatics partnerships was made via email to librarians who have participated in the National Center for Biotechnology Information's Advanced Workshop for Bioinformatics Information Specialists. Librarians from Harvard University, the University of Florida, the University of Minnesota, and Vanderbilt University responded and expressed willingness to contribute information on their institutions, programs, services, and collaborating partners. Similarities and differences in programs and collaborations were identified.

resultsThe four librarians have developed partnerships with other units on their campuses that can be categorized into the following areas: knowledge management, instruction, and electronic resource support. All primarily support freely accessible electronic resources, while other campus units deal with fee-based ones. These demarcations are apparent in resource provision as well as in subsequent support and instruction. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Through environmental scanning and networking with colleagues, librarians who provide bioinformatics support can develop fruitful collaborations. Visibility is key to building collaborations, as is broad-based thinking in terms of potential partners.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorInterinstitutional RelationsComputational BiologyLibraries, MedicalLibrary ServicesPrivate SectorUniversities

Identifiers

PMID16888668
PMCPMC1525329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.