Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16888628›Full record

ArticleThe EMBO journal2006

Genome-wide replication profiles of S-phase checkpoint mutants reveal fragile sites in yeast.

Miruthubashini Raveendranathan, Sharbani Chattopadhyay, Yung-Tsi Bolon, Justin Haworth, Duncan J Clarke, Anja-Katrin Bielinsky

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The EMBO journal, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Small RNAs, Big Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. MCM10: one tool for all-Integrity, maintenance and damage control.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2014
    Review
  15. Genome-wide high-resolution mapping of chromosome fragile sites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Enigmatic roles of Mcm10 in DNA replication.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2013
    Review
  19. Four pillars of the S-phase checkpoint.Genes & development · 2013
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Miruthubashini RaveendranathanDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Sharbani Chattopadhyay
Yung-Tsi Bolon
Justin Haworth
Duncan J Clarke
Anja-Katrin Bielinsky
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

Budding Yeast-S-phase Checkpoint ControlR01CA099033 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI CLARKE, DUNCAN J · 2003 to 2007
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS CA099033NCI NIH HHS R01 CA099033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The S-phase checkpoint kinases Mec1 and Rad53 in the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, are activated in response to replication stress that induces replication fork arrest. In the absence of a functional S-phase checkpoint, stalled replication forks collapse and give rise to chromosome breakage. In an attempt to better understand replication dynamics in S-phase checkpoint mutants, we developed a replication origin array for budding yeast that contains 424 of 432 previously identified potential origin regions. As expected, mec1-1 and rad53-1 mutants failed to inhibit late origin activation. Surprisingly however, 17 early-firing regions were not replicated efficiently in these mutants. This was not due to a lack of initiation, but rather to problems during elongation, as replication forks arrested in close proximity to these origins, resulting in the accumulation of small replication intermediates and eventual replication fork collapse. Importantly, these regions were not only prone to chromosome breakage in the presence of exogenous stress but also in its absence, similar to fragile sites in the human genome.

Indexed as

Chromosome Fragile SitesDNA ReplicationS PhaseCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 2Gene Expression Regulation, FungalGenome, FungalIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMutationOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesReplication OriginSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 2Intracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMEC1 protein, S cerevisiaeProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRAD53 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID16888628
PMCPMC1538557
OpenAlexW2130115977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.