ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2006
Overcoming barriers to recruitment in health research.
Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Ethical issues and practical barriers in internet-based suicide prevention research: a review and investigator survey.BMC medical ethics · 2020Pooled it
- Eligibility criteria in knee osteoarthritis clinical trials: systematic review.Clinical rheumatology · 2013Pooled it
- Rivastigmine for dementia in people with Down syndrome.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009Pooled it
- Memantine for dementia in people with Down syndrome.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009Pooled it
- Galantamine for dementia in people with Down syndrome.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009Pooled it
- Donepezil for dementia in people with Down syndrome.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009Pooled it
- Temporary treatment cessation compared with continuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for adults with renal cancer: the STAR non-inferiority RCT.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Participant recruitment in sensitive surveys: a comparative trial of 'opt in' versus 'opt out' approaches.BMC medical research methodology · 2013Trial
- Trial
- Exploring patients' reasons for declining contact in a cognitive behavioural therapy randomised controlled trial in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012Trial
- Trial
- Integrating public engagement to promote transparent data use in a new UK-wide birth cohort.International journal of population data science · 2025Article
- Article
- Fit to Study: Reflections on designing and implementing a large-scale randomized controlled trial in secondary schools.Trends in neuroscience and education · 2020Review
- The rise and fall of an opt-out system.Scandinavian journal of public health · 2020Article
- Consent to discuss participation in research: a pilot study.Evidence-based mental health · 2020Article
- Patient perspectives on use of electronic health records for research recruitment.BMC medical research methodology · 2019Article
- The Use of Web-Based Technologies in Health Research Participation: Qualitative Study of Consumer and Researcher Experiences.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018Article
- Practical application of opt-out recruitment methods in two health services research studies.BMC medical research methodology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.