Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16886045›Full record

ArticleThe Clinical biochemist. Reviews2006

Diagnosis of the haemoglobinopathies.

Ronald J A Trent

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Clinical biochemist. Reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Artemisinin Therapy for Malaria in Hemoglobinopathies: A Systematic Review.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. HBE homozygous haemoglobinpathy - Fortuitous finding.Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ronald J A TrentDepartment of Molecular & Clinical Genetics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia. rtrent@med.usyd.edu.au

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite having been extensively studied at both the biochemical, haematological and molecular levels, the haemoglobinopathies continue to provide a diagnostic challenge particularly in the multiethnic communities seen in Australia. Early detection and characterisation of the haemoglobinopathies is essential so that appropriate counselling can be provided to couples and families who may be at risk of severe haematological consequences. Although DNA diagnostics have made a major impact on our understanding and detection of the haemoglobinopathies, DNA mutation testing should never be considered a short cut or the test of first choice in the workup of a haemoglobinopathy. A careful three tier approach involving: (1) Full blood count (2) Special haematological tests, followed by (3) DNA mutation analysis, provides the most effective way in which to detect primary gene mutations as well as gene-gene interactions that can influence the overall phenotype. Just as important as the laboratory investigations is the family work up. Often, the first and most helpful clue to gene gene interactions comes from the family study. In Australia, there are many different forms of alpha and beta thalassaemia. Increasingly, different Hb Variants are being detected, and their effects per se, or in combination with the thalassaemias, provide additional diagnostic challenges.

Identifiers

PMID16886045
PMCPMC1390791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.