Why not seek clever regulation? A reply to Liberman.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Minimising the harm from nicotine use: finding the right regulatory framework.Tobacco control · 2013
   Article
2. Daring to dream: reactions to tobacco endgame ideas among policy-makers, media and public health practitioners.BMC public health · 2011
   Article
3. The tobacco use management system: analyzing tobacco control from a systems perspective.American journal of public health · 2010
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  The future of tobacco regulation: a response to a proposal for fundamental institutional change.2006

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as