Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16882040›Full record

ArticleTraffic (Copenhagen, Denmark)2006

A phenotypic recessive, post-entry block in rabbit cells that results in aberrant trafficking of HIV-1.

Teresa Cutiño-Moguel, Ariberto Fassati

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Traffic (Copenhagen, Denmark), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The wide utility of rabbits as models of human diseases.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2018
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Apparent effect of rabbit endogenous lentivirus type K acquisition on retrovirus restriction by lagomorph Trim5αs.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Teresa Cutiño-MoguelWohl Virion Centre, Division of Infection and Immunity, MRC Centre of Medical Molecular Virology, University College London, 46 Cleveland Street, London W1T 4JF, UK.
Ariberto Fassati
University College London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 074039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rabbit cells are poorly permissive to HIV-1 infection, but little is known about the nature of this block. Here, we show that the block to infection is mainly at the level of reverse transcription (RT), is independent of the cell receptor used by the virus for entry, cannot be effectively saturated with high doses of virus or virus-like particles, and has a recessive phenotype in human-rabbit heterokaryons. RT complexes (RTCs) extracted from human and rabbit cells have different densities but are both competent for RT in an in vitro endogenous assay. Cell fractionation showed that HIV-1 is trafficked in a different way in human and rabbit cells and that correct intracellular trafficking is linked to efficient RT and high infectivity in vivo. Viral DNA accumulated in rabbit cell nuclei only at a later stage and failed to associate with chromatin, suggesting a further block prior to integration. Our data point to the existence of cellular factors regulating the early stages of intracytoplasmic and possibly intranuclear HIV-1 trafficking.

Indexed as

Membrane FusionAnimalsBlotting, WesternCell LineElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelHIV-1PhenotypeRabbitsReceptors, HIVReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionTranscription, GeneticReceptors, HIV

Identifiers

PMID16882040
PMCPMC1934423
OpenAlexW1917181015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.