Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16880386›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2006

Cellular scaling rules for rodent brains.

Suzana Herculano-Houzel, Bruno Mota, Roberto Lent

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 254 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
254citing papers in PubMed
13.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

254 citing papers in PubMed, 575 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Decoding Alzheimer's Disease One Cell Class at a Time.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Neurodatascience: Past, Present, and Future.Data science in science · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. AAV-PHP.eB Peripheral Delivery and Central Expression in Cre Mice.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

194 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Suzana Herculano-HouzelDepartamento de Anatomia, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 21941-590, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. suzanahh@ism.com.br
Bruno Mota
Roberto Lent
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRCentro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How do cell number and size determine brain size? Here, we show that, in the order Rodentia, increased size of the cerebral cortex, cerebellum, and remaining areas across six species is achieved through greater numbers of neurons of larger size, and much greater numbers of nonneuronal cells of roughly invariant size, such that the ratio between total neuronal and nonneuronal mass remains constant across species. Although relative cerebellar size remains stable among rodents, the number of cerebellar neurons increases with brain size more rapidly than in the cortex, such that the cerebellar fraction of total brain neurons increases with brain size. In contrast, although the relative cortical size increases with total brain size, the cortical fraction of total brain neurons remains constant. We propose that the faster increase in average neuronal size in the cerebral cortex than in the cerebellum as these structures gain neurons and the rapidly increasing glial numbers that generate glial mass to match total neuronal mass at a fixed glia/neuron total mass ratio are fundamental cellular constraints that lead to the relative expansion of cerebral cortical volume across species.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainCerebellumCerebral CortexGuinea PigsMaleMiceModels, NeurologicalNeuronsRatsRats, WistarRodentiaSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID16880386
PMCPMC1567708
OpenAlexW2166670234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.