ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2006
Patients' perceptions of written consent: questionnaire study.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 133 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions to promote informed consent for patients undergoing surgical and other invasive healthcare procedures.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Internet based patient education improves informed consent for elective orthopaedic surgery: a randomized controlled trial.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2015Trial
- What a signature adds to the consent process.Surgical endoscopy · 2008Trial
- IsAI & society · 2026Article
- Enhanced consent and patient counselling using virtual reality for patients undergoing shockwave lithotripsy: prospective outcomes from a university teaching hospital.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Impact of video -based incentive on patient willingness to read the informed consent form with comprehension before minimally-invasive surgery: a randomized controlled trial.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025Article
- Patients' perceptions and understanding of preoperative informed consent: A qualitative thematic analysis from Tanzania.SAGE open medicine · 2025Article
- Perceptions of Singaporeans towards informed consent: a cross-sectional survey.Singapore medical journal · 2024Article
- Patient knowledge of surgical informed consent and shared decision-making process among surgical patients in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Patient safety in surgery · 2024Article
- Patient Perception of Informed Consent and Its Associated Factors among Surgical Patients Attending Public Hospitals in Dessie City Administration, Northeast Ethiopia.Critical care research and practice · 2022Article
- Role of the consent form in UK veterinary practice.The Veterinary record · 2020Article
- Article
- A novel metadata management model to capture consent for record linkage in longitudinal research studies.Informatics for health & social care · 2019Article
- How Does the Patient React After Reading the Informed Consent Form of a Gynecological Surgery? A Qualitative Study.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2018Article
- Healthcare professionals' and patients' perspectives on consent to clinical genetic testing: moving towards a more relational approach.BMC medical ethics · 2017Article
- The consent process: Enabling or disabling patients' active participation?Health (London, England : 1997) · 2017Article
- Doctors' perspectives of informed consent for non-emergency surgical procedures: a qualitative interview study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2016Article
- Use of a simplified consent form to facilitate patient understanding of informed consent for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2016Article
- A survey on patients' knowledge and expectations during informed consent for spinal surgery: can we improve the shared decision-making process?Patient safety in surgery · 2016Article
- Patient engagement with research: European population register study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo examine patients' understanding of the status, function, and remit of written consent to surgery.
designProspective questionnaire study. Questionnaires were sent to patients within one month of surgery. Responses were analysed with frequencies and single variable analyses.
settingLarge teaching hospital.
participants732 patients who had undergone surgery in obstetrics and gynaecology over a six month period.
main outcome measuresPatients' awareness of the legal implications of written consent and their views on the function and remit of the consent form.
resultsPatients had limited understanding of the legal standing of written consent. Nearly half (46%, 95% confidence interval 43% to 50%) of patients believed the primary function of consent forms was to protect hospitals and 68% (65% to 71%) thought consent forms allowed doctors to assume control. Only 41% (37% to 44%) of patients believed consent forms made their wishes known.
conclusionsMany patients seem to have limited awareness of the legal implications of signing or not signing consent forms, and they do not recognise written consent as primarily serving their interests. Current consent procedures seem inadequate as a means for the expression of autonomous choice, and their ethical standing and credibility can be called into question.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.