Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16879732›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2006

Mechanisms of critical illness--classifying microcirculatory flow abnormalities in distributive shock.

Paul W G Elbers, Can Ince

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02085291 (The Effect of Fluids and Norepinephrine for Mean Arterial Pressure Titration to Patients' Usual Levels on the Microcirculation of Initial Resuscitated Hypertensive Septic Shock Patients.), which is not on this map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02085291 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Fluids and Norepinephrine for Mean Arterial Pressure Titration to Patients' Usual Levels on the Microcirculation of Initial Resuscitated Hypertensive Septic Shock Patients.

TypeinterventionalSponsorSoutheast University, ChinaRan2014 to 2017Enrolled24ConditionsSeptic Shock, HypertensionArmsNorepinephrine, Crystalloid
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 152 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Effects of Fluids on the Macro- and Microcirculations.Critical care (London, England) · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Sublingual microcirculatory blood flow and vessel density in Sherpas at high altitude.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul W G ElbersDepartment of Physiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Can Ince
Academic Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over 30 years ago Weil and Shubin proposed a re-classification of shock states and identified hypovolemic, cardiogenic, obstructive and distributive shock. The first three categories have in common that they are associated with a fall in cardiac output. Distributive shock, such as occurs during sepsis and septic shock, however, is associated with an abnormal distribution of microvascular blood flow and metabolic distress in the presence of normal or even supranormal levels of cardiac output. This Bench-to-bedside review looks at the recent insights that have been gained into the nature of distributive shock. Its pathophysiology can best be described as a microcirculatory and mitochondrial distress syndrome, where time and therapy form an integral part of the definition. The clinical introduction of new microcirculatory imaging techniques, such as orthogonal polarization spectral and side-stream dark-field imaging, have allowed direct observation of the microcirculation at the bedside. Images of the sublingual microcirculation during septic shock and resuscitation have revealed that the distributive defect of blood flow occurs at the capillary level. In this paper, we classify the different types of heterogeneous flow patterns of microcirculatory abnormalities found during different types of distributive shock. Analysis of these patterns gave a five class classification system to define the types of microcirculatory abnormalities found in different types of distributive shock and indicated that distributive shock occurs in many other clinical conditions than just sepsis and septic shock. It is likely that different mechanisms defined by pathology and treatment underlie these abnormalities observed in the different classes. Functionally, however, they all cause a distributive defect resulting in microcirculatory shunting and regional dysoxia. It is hoped that this classification system will help in the identification of mechanisms underlying these abnormalities and indicate optimal therapies for resuscitating septic and other types of distributive shock.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessHumansMicrocirculationMouth FloorShock

Identifiers

PMID16879732
PMCPMC1750971
OpenAlexW2106656928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.