Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16874163›Full record

ReviewThe Pediatric infectious disease journal2006

Safety and impact of chlorhexidine antisepsis interventions for improving neonatal health in developing countries.

Luke C Mullany, Gary L Darmstadt, James M Tielsch

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Pediatric infectious disease journal, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00109616 phase3completednot on this map

Newborn Antiseptic Washing and Neonatal Mortality-Nepal

TypeinterventionalSponsorEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)Ran2002 to 2006Enrolled17,000ConditionsNeonatal MortalityArmsNewborn skin cleansing with 0.25% chlorhexidine solution, Cleansing of umbilical cord with soap and water solution, Cleansing of umbilical cord with 4% chlorhexidine
NCT00434408 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2007, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Umbilical Cord Cleansing With Chlorhexidine on Neonatal Mortality and Omphalitis in Rural Sylhet District of Bangladesh

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthRan2007 to 2010Enrolled28,797ConditionsOmphalitis, InfectionArmschx once, CHX x 7 days, dry cord care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Umbilical cord cleansing with chlorhexidine in neonates: a systematic review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Decolonization to prevent Staphylococcus aureus transmission and infections in the neonatal intensive care unit.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2014
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luke C MullanyDepartment of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21211, USA. lmullany@jhsph.edu
Gary L Darmstadt
James M Tielsch
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

ZINC SUPPLEMENTATION IMPACT ON CHILD MORTALITY--NEPALR01HD038753 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TIELSCH, JAMES M · 2000 to 2003
$3.5M
Newborn Antiseptic Washing and Neonatal Mortality-NepalR01HD044004 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TIELSCH, JAMES M · 2003 to 2005
$1.5M
NICHD NIH HHS HD38753NICHD NIH HHS HD44004NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD038753NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD044004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Affordable, efficacious, and safe interventions to prevent infections and improve neonatal survival in low-resource settings are needed. Chlorhexidine is a broad-spectrum antiseptic that has been used extensively for many decades in hospital and other clinical settings. It has also been given as maternal vaginal lavage, full-body newborn skin cleansing, and/or umbilical cord cleansing to prevent infection in neonates. Recent evidence suggests that these chlorhexidine interventions may have significant public health impact on the burden of neonatal infection and mortality in developing countries. This review examines the available data from randomized and nonrandomized studies of chlorhexidine cleansing, with a primary focus on potential uses in low-resource settings. Safety issues related to chlorhexidine use in newborns are reviewed, and future research priorities for chlorhexidine interventions for neonatal health in developing countries are discussed. We conclude that maternal vaginal cleansing combined with newborn skin cleansing could reduce neonatal infections and mortality in hospitals of sub-Saharan Africa, but the individual impact of these interventions must be determined, particularly in community settings. There is evidence for a protective benefit of newborn skin and umbilical cord cleansing with chlorhexidine in the community in south Asia. Effectiveness trials in that region are required to address the feasibility of community-based delivery methods such as incorporating these interventions into clean birth kits or training programs for minimally skilled delivery assistants or family members. Efficacy trials for all chlorhexidine interventions are needed in low-resource settings in Africa, and the benefit of maternal vaginal cleansing beyond that provided by newborn skin cleansing needs to be determined.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesAnti-Infective AgentsAntisepsisChlorhexidineClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornMaternal MortalityPerinatal CarePregnancySafetySkinUmbilicusVaginaAnti-Infective AgentsChlorhexidine

Identifiers

PMID16874163
PMCPMC2386993
OpenAlexW1998605536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.