ArticleGenome biology2006
Fine scale structural variants distinguish the genomes of Drosophila melanogaster and D. pseudoobscura.
Article in Genome biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Characteristics and possible mechanisms of formation of microinversions distinguishing human and chimpanzee genomes.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Annotating the Insect Regulatory Genome.Insects · 2021Review
- REDfly: the transcriptional regulatory element database for Drosophila.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- Drosophila functional elements are embedded in structurally constrained sequences.PLoS genetics · 2013Article
- Homoplastic microinversions and the avian tree of life.BMC evolutionary biology · 2011Article
- Evolutionary plasticity of polycomb/trithorax response elements in Drosophila species.PLoS biology · 2008Article
- REDfly 2.0: an integrated database of cis-regulatory modules and transcription factor binding sites in Drosophila.Nucleic acids research · 2008Article
- Principles of genome evolution in the Drosophila melanogaster species group.PLoS biology · 2007Article
- Parallel evolution of conserved non-coding elements that target a common set of developmental regulatory genes from worms to humans.Genome biology · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA primary objective of comparative genomics is to identify genomic elements of functional significance that contribute to phenotypic diversity. Complex changes in genome structure (insertions, duplications, rearrangements, translocations) may be widespread, and have important effects on organismal diversity. Any survey of genomic variation is incomplete without an assessment of structural changes.
resultsWe re-examine the genome sequences of the diverged species Drosophila melanogaster and D. pseudoobscura to identify fine-scale structural features that distinguish the genomes. We detect 95 large insertion/deletion events that occur within the introns of orthologous gene pairs, the majority of which represent insertion of transposable elements. We also identify 143 microinversions below 5 kb in size. These microinversions reside within introns or just upstream or downstream of genes, and invert conserved DNA sequence. The sequence conservation within microinversions suggests they may be enriched for functional genetic elements, and their position with respect to known genes implicates them in the regulation of gene expression. Although we found a distinct pattern of GC content across microinversions, this was indistinguishable from the pattern observed across blocks of conserved non-coding sequence.
conclusionDrosophila has long been known as a genus harboring a variety of large inversions that disrupt chromosome colinearity. Here we demonstrate that microinversions, many of which are below 1 kb in length, located in/near genes may also be an important source of genetic variation in Drosophila. Further examination of other Drosophila genome sequences will likely identify an array of novel microinversion events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.