Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16872502›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2006

A literature-based similarity metric for biological processes.

Monica Chagoyen, Pedro Carmona-Saez, Concha Gil, Jose M Carazo, Alberto Pascual-Montano

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A review on Gene Ontology evaluations.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Monica ChagoyenBiocomputing Unit, Centro Nacional de Biotecnologia--CSIC, Madrid, Spain. monica.chagoyen@cnb.uam.es
Pedro Carmona-Saez
Concha Gil
Jose M Carazo
Alberto Pascual-Montano

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent analyses in systems biology pursue the discovery of functional modules within the cell. Recognition of such modules requires the integrative analysis of genome-wide experimental data together with available functional schemes. In this line, methods to bridge the gap between the abstract definitions of cellular processes in current schemes and the interlinked nature of biological networks are required.

resultsThis work explores the use of the scientific literature to establish potential relationships among cellular processes. To this end we have used a document based similarity method to compute pair-wise similarities of the biological processes described in the Gene Ontology (GO). The method has been applied to the biological processes annotated for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. We compared our results with similarities obtained with two ontology-based metrics, as well as with gene product annotation relationships. We show that the literature-based metric conserves most direct ontological relationships, while reveals biologically sounded similarities that are not obtained using ontology-based metrics and/or genome annotation.

conclusionThe scientific literature is a valuable source of information from which to compute similarities among biological processes. The associations discovered by literature analysis are a valuable complement to those encoded in existing functional schemes, and those that arise by genome annotation. These similarities can be used to conveniently map the interlinked structure of cellular processes in a particular organism.

Indexed as

Databases, BibliographicPhysiological PhenomenaDatabases, GeneticGenes, FungalIon TransportNatural Language ProcessingPattern Recognition, AutomatedSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSignal TransductionSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID16872502
PMCPMC1579237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.