Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16872032›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science

Validation of lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in patients with symptomatic breast cancer.

R A Cahill, L Diamond, R Landers, D Walsh, R G K Watson

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

R A CahillDept of Surgery, Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Breast Care Unit, Waterford Regional Hospital.
L Diamond
R Landers
D Walsh
R G K Watson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer aims to allow lymph node negative women to avoid axillary clearance by providing a minimally invasive means of staging the axilla. However, before its implementation into routine clinical practice, initiating departments must verify their expertise in each of the surgical, radiological and pathological components necessary for its successful performance. Here, we present our validation experience.

methodsThirty patients with breast cancer of any stage (but without clinical axillary lymphadenopathy) undergoing definitive resection of their primary tumour underwent lymphatic mapping (using blue dye alone or in combination with radioisotope) and sentinel node biopsy concurrent with standard level II axillary clearance over a ten month period.

resultsAll patients had sentinel nodes identified intraoperatively. The sentinel node in 29 patients correctly predicted the status of axillary involvement. One patient had non-sentinel nodal disease without metastases being identified in their sentinel node. Such a single false negative out of thirty patients is considered acceptable by current guidelines.

conclusionValidation of expertise in sentinel node identification and analysis is feasible over a relatively short period of time in a regional symptomatic breast unit. We now feel confident in offering this procedure to selected patients with breast cancer in our catchment area in place of routine axillary clearance.

Indexed as

Sentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAdultAgedAxillaBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansIrelandLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMastectomyMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPredictive Value of TestsRadionuclide ImagingRadiopharmaceuticalsRadiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID16872032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.