ArticlePLoS clinical trials2006
The clinical trials directive: how is it affecting Europe's noncommercial research?
Article in PLoS clinical trials, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Positive and negative aspects of bacteriophages and their immense role in the food chain.NPJ science of food · 2024Review
- Regulations of phage therapy across the world.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- Trends of Phase I Clinical Trials in the Latest Ten Years across Five European Countries.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Impact of the Clinical Trials Act on Noncommercial Clinical Research in Japan: An Interrupted Time-series Analysis.Journal of epidemiology · 2022Article
- [Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions].Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2021Review
- The Current Status of European and National Financial Sources for Clinical Research and Their Impact on Paediatric Non-commercial Clinical Trials: A Case Study of the Czech Republic.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2020Article
- Low-risk trials for children and pregnant women threatened by unnecessary strict regulations. Does the coming EU Clinical Trial Regulation offer a solution?European journal of pediatrics · 2020Review
- Review
- Review
- Input analysis for two public consultations on the EU Clinical Trials Regulation.Health research policy and systems · 2016Article
- Article
- Article
- Using a business model approach and marketing techniques for recruitment to clinical trials.Trials · 2011Review
- Impact of the European clinical trials directive on prospective academic clinical trials associated with BMT.Bone marrow transplantation · 2011Article
- The health of European medical research. Attempts are under way to update EU regulations, with the aim of harmonizing clinical research across the continent.EMBO reports · 2011Article
- Tissue Engineering Stem Cells - An e-Governance Strategy.The open orthopaedics journal · 2011Article
- Regulatory impediments jeopardizing the conduct of clinical trials in Europe funded by the National Institutes of Health.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2010Article
- The unintended consequences of clinical trials regulations.PLoS medicine · 2009Article
- Article
- Trends in the global funding and activity of cancer research.Molecular oncology · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.