ArticlePLoS clinical trials2006
Principles for strengthening the integrity of clinical research.
Article in PLoS clinical trials, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Critical appraisal of methods used in randomized controlled trials of treatments for temporomandibular disorders.Journal of orofacial pain · 2010Pooled it
- Restoring invisible and abandoned trials: a call for people to publish the findings.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2013Article
- Urogynaecological research: current and future developments.International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction · 2007Article
- Bias in research and conflict of interest: why should we care?International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction · 2007Article
- Introducing PLoS clinical trials: a different approach to publishing trial results.PLoS clinical trials · 2006Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.