Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16870752›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2006

Comparative analysis of sequences flanking tet(W) resistance genes in multiple species of gut bacteria.

Katarzyna A Kazimierczak, Harry J Flint, Karen P Scott

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mobile Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Probiotics.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Tetracycline Resistance Gene,Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Dietary supplementation of Neem (Veterinary world · 2020
    Article
  19. Transferable Resistance GeneAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katarzyna A KazimierczakRowett Research Institute, Greenburn Road, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB21 9SB, UK.
Harry J Flint
Karen P Scott

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

tet(W) is one of the most abundant tetracycline resistance genes found in bacteria from the mammalian gut and was first identified in the rumen anaerobe Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens 1.230, where it is highly mobile and its transfer is associated with the transposable chromosomal element TnB1230. In order to compare the genetic basis for tet(W) carriage in different bacteria, we studied sequences flanking tet(W) in representatives of seven bacterial genera originating in diverse gut environments. The sequences 657 bp upstream and 43 bp downstream of tet(W) were 96 to 100% similar in all strains examined. A common open reading frame (ORF) was identified downstream of tet(W) in five different bacteria, while another conserved ORF that flanked tet(W) in B. fibrisolvens 1.230 was also present upstream of tet(W) in a human colonic Roseburia isolate and in another rumen B. fibrisolvens isolate. In one species, Bifidobacterium longum (strain F8), a novel transposase was located within the conserved 657-bp region upstream of tet(W) and was flanked by imperfect direct repeats. Additional direct repeats 6 bp long were identified on each end of a chromosomal ORF interrupted by the insertion of the putative transposase and the tet(W) gene. This tet(W) gene was transferable at low frequencies between Bifidobacterium strains. A putative minielement carrying a copy of tet(W) was identified in B. fibrisolvens transconjugants that had acquired the tet(W) gene on TnB1230. Several different mechanisms, including mechanisms involving plasmids and conjugative transposons, appear to be involved in the horizontal transfer of tet(W) genes, but small core regions that may function as minielements are conserved.

Indexed as

Genes, BacterialAmino Acid MotifsAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBacteriaBacterial ProteinsBase SequenceCatalytic DomainConjugation, GeneticConserved SequenceDNA, BacterialDNA Transposable ElementsGenetic VariationHumansIntestinesMolecular Sequence DataBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID16870752
PMCPMC1538676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.