SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2006
Who's using PDAs? Estimates of PDA use by health care providers: a systematic review of surveys.
Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- 'Learning from home': role of e-learning methodologies and tools during novel coronavirus pandemic outbreak.Postgraduate medical journal · 2021Pooled it
- A systematic review of healthcare applications for smartphones.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2012Pooled it
- The impact of mobile handheld technology on hospital physicians' work practices and patient care: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAPooled it
- Practicing evidence based medicine at the bedside: a randomized controlled pilot study in undergraduate medical students assessing the practicality of tablets, smartphones, and computers in clinical life.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2014Trial
- Handheld vs. laptop computers for electronic data collection in clinical research: a crossover randomized trial.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIATrial
- The use of communication applications among anaesthetists and other medical professionals in Australia: results of a national survey.Anaesthesia and intensive care · 2026Article
- A novel smartphone application for the tracking of procedural numbers and trainee experience in gastrointestinal endoscopy.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Introducing a mobile learning model in medical education during COVID-19; a critical review.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2022Article
- Ambulatory Fluoroquinolone Use in the United States, 2015-2019.Open forum infectious diseases · 2021Article
- Technological Ecological Momentary Assessment Tools to Study Type 1 Diabetes in Youth: Viewpoint of Methodologies.JMIR diabetes · 2021Article
- Electronic data capture for large scale typhoid surveillance, household contact tracing, and health utilisation survey: Strategic Typhoid Alliance across Africa and Asia.Wellcome open research · 2020Article
- GPs' perspectives on eHealth use in the Czech Republic: a cross-sectional mixed-design survey study.BJGP open · 2019Article
- Exploring Care Providers' Perceptions and Current Use of Telehealth Technology at Work, in Daily Life, and in Education: Qualitative and Quantitative Study.JMIR medical education · 2019Article
- Family physicians' utility of social media: a survey comparison among family medicine residents and physicians.African health sciences · 2018Article
- Smartphones in clinical practice: doctors' experience at two Dublin paediatric teaching hospitals.Irish journal of medical science · 2018Article
- Is innovative workforce planning software the solution to NHS staffing and cost crisis? An exploration of the locum industry.BMC health services research · 2018Article
- Effects of Cognitive Bias Modification Training via Smartphones.Frontiers in psychology · 2017Article
- Residents' use of mobile technologies: three challenges for graduate medical education.BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning · 2017Article
- The "e-Generation": The Technological Usage and Experiences of Medical Students from a Developing Country.International journal of telemedicine and applications · 2017Article
- Smartphones and Medical Applications in the Emergency Department Daily Practice.Emergency (Tehran, Iran) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPersonal digital assistants (PDAs) find many uses in health care. Knowing rates of collective PDA use among health care providers is an important guiding step to further understanding those health care contexts that are most suited to PDA use and whether PDAs provide improved health outcomes.
objectivesThe objectives of this study were to estimate current and future PDA use among health care providers and to discuss possible implications of that use on choice of technology in clinical practice and research.
methodsThis study was a systematic review of PDA usage surveys. Surveys were identified as part of an ongoing systematic review on the use of handheld devices. Reports from eight databases covering both biomedical sciences and engineering (1993-2006) were screened against distinct eligibility criteria. Data from included surveys were extracted and verified in a standardized way and were assessed descriptively.
resultsWe identified 23 relevant surveys, 15 of which were derived from peer-reviewed journals. This cohort of surveys was published between 2000 and 2005. Overall, since 1999, there is clear evidence of an increasing trend in PDA use. The current overall adoption rate for individual professional use ranges between 45% and 85%, indicating high but somewhat variable adoption, primarily among physicians.
conclusionsYounger physicians and residents and those working in large and hospital-based practices are more likely to use a PDA. The adoption rate is now at its highest rate of increase according to a commonly accepted diffusion of innovations model. A common problem with the evaluation of information technology is that use frequently precedes research. This is the case here, in which PDA adoption rates are already high and projections are for rapid growth in the short term. In general, it appears that professional PDA use in health care settings involves more administrative and organizational tasks than those related to patient care, perhaps signaling where the growth in adoption is most likely to occur. We conclude that physicians are likely accustomed to using a PDA, and, therefore, technology expertise will probably not be a barrier to implementing PDA applications. However, there is an urgent need to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of specific tasks using handheld technology to inform those developing and those using PDA applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.