Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16865770›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2006

E-cadherin expression pattern in primary colorectal carcinomas and their metastases reflects disease outcome.

Adam Elzagheid, Annika Algars, Riyad Bendardaf, Hanan Lamlum, Raija Ristamaki, Yrjo Collan, Kari Syrjanen, Seppo Pyrhonen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Prognostic Significance ofCancer management and research · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Liver metastases: Microenvironments and ex-vivo models.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2016
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Relation of glypican-3 and E-cadherin expressions to clinicopathological features and prognosis of mucinous and non-mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Contribution of cyclin D1 (CCND1) and E-cadherin (CDH1) alterations to colorectal cancer susceptibility: a case-control study.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adam ElzagheidDepartment of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku University Hospital, Savitehtaankatu 1 PB 52, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland. adibel@utu.fi
Annika Algars
Riyad Bendardaf
Hanan Lamlum
Raija Ristamaki
Yrjo Collan
Kari Syrjanen
Seppo Pyrhonen
Turku University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate the changes that occur in E-cadherin expression during the process of metastasis in colorectal cancer.

methodsE-cadherin expression was detected by immunohistochemistry and two indices of expression were calculated which reflected the level of expression and the locations (membrane and cytoplasm). Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were used to assess the value of these two E-cadherin indices as predictors of both disease-free (DFS) and disease-specific (DSS) survival.

resultsE-cadherin membrane index (MI), but not cytoplasmic index (CI), was significantly higher in primary tumors than their metastases (P = 0.0001). Furthermore, both primary tumor MI and CI were higher among the patients who developed subsequent metastasis (P = 0.022 and P = 0.007, respectively). Interestingly, both indices were higher in liver metastase compared to other anatomic sites (MI, P = 0.034 and CI, P = 0.022). The CI of the primary tumors was a significant predictor of DFS (P = 0.042, univariate analysis), with a strong inverse correlation between CI and DFS (P = 0.006, multivariate analysis). Finally, the MI of primary tumor proved to be a significant independent predictor of DSS, with higher indices being associated with a more favorable outcome (P = 0.016).

conclusionExamination of E-cadherin expression and distribution in colorectal tumors can be extremely valuable in predicting disease recurrence. The observation that aberrant cytoplasmic expression of E-cadherin can predict disease recurrence is obviously of great importance for both patients and clinicians, and significantly affects decisions concerning the therapy and management of the patients.

Indexed as

CadherinsCell MembraneColorectal NeoplasmsCytoplasmDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansImmunohistochemistryLiver NeoplasmsMaleMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisCadherins

Identifiers

PMID16865770
PMCPMC4087739
OpenAlexW291649157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.