Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16865317›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2006

Phyllodes tumor of the breast: the challenge persists.

Shih-Ping Cheng, Yuan-Ching Chang, Tsang-Pai Liu, Jie-Jen Lee, Chi-Yuan Tzen, Chien-Liang Liu

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Prognostic factors of breast phyllodes tumors.Histology and histopathology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Contemporary Multi-Institutional Cohort of 550 Cases of Phyllodes Tumors (2007-2017) Demonstrates a Need for More Individualized Margin Guidelines.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shih-Ping ChengDepartment of Surgery, Mackay Memorial Hospital, 92, Sec 2, Chung-Shan North Road, and Mackay Medicine, Nursing, and Management College, Taipei, 10449, Taiwan.
Yuan-Ching Chang
Tsang-Pai Liu
Jie-Jen Lee
Chi-Yuan Tzen
Chien-Liang Liu
Mackay Memorial Hospital · TWMackay Junior College of Medicine, Nursing and Management · TWTaipei Medical University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPhyllodes tumors of the breast are uncommon, and it is difficult to predict biologic behavior based on clinicopathologic features. Despite the wealth of data on the factors to predict recurrence, little is known about the impact of treatment refinements. This study seeks to define changes in patient characteristics, histopathologic parameters, and outcome between the two periods before and after the care of patients with breast diseases was centralized to a breast specialty.

methodsThe records of 182 patients with phyllodes tumors managed surgically were reviewed. Patients treated from 1985 to 1996 (n=81) were compared with those seen from 1997 to 2004 (n=101).

resultsThe analysis of the two treatment periods revealed that there was a decrease in tumor size at diagnosis, from 7.7 cm during the earlier period to 4.6 cm during the recent period (P=0.003). The patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery were significantly increased during the recent period. In contrast, pathologic features and local recurrence rates remained unchanged during the study period. Multivariate analysis revealed that positive surgical margin was the only independent predictor of recurrence, with an increased hazard of 8.0. Overall, upgrading to the next grade was observed in 16% of recurrences.

conclusionsBreast-conserving surgery with clear margins is the current treatment of choice for phyllodes tumors, but this strategy does not further reduce local recurrence effectively. Optimal management continues to be a challenge.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsChildFemaleHumansMastectomyMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPhyllodes Tumor

Identifiers

PMID16865317
OpenAlexW1976410247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.