Trial reportHeart and vessels2006
Temporary inferior vena cava filter for deep vein thrombosis and acute pulmonary thromboembolism: effectiveness and indication.
Trial report in Heart and vessels, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Complications Associated With Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrieval: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Review
- Case report on the non-operative management of a retrievable inferior vena cava filter perforating the duodenum.International journal of surgery case reports · 2017Article
- Prevalence of venous thromboembolism in neurosurgical patients.Heart and vessels · 2009Article
- Fatal migration of vena caval filters.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although the temporary inferior vena cava filter (IVC-F) is being used increasingly for protection against pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE), indications for its use are not established. Our strategy for the prevention of PTE is: (1) contraindication or failure of anticoagulation: permanent IVC-F; (2) for patients with residual proximal deep vein thrombosis (a) who have permanent risk factor: permanent IVC-F; (b) who have transient risk factor: temporary IVC-F; (3) others: no IVC-F. Temporary IVC-F was also implanted in deep vein thrombosis (DVT) patients without PTE who were preoperation or had floating thrombus. We investigated the outcome of patients given a temporary IVC-F versus those given a permanent IVC-F to clarify the efficacy and our strategy for implantation of a temporary IVC-F. Subjects were 12 men and 38 women with acute PTE and/or floating DVT admitted to our hospital between April 1999 and April 2002. Patient age was 25-91 years (mean 63 years). Eighteen patients were given a permanent IVC-F (group A) and 32 patients were given a temporary IVC-F (group B) as primary treatment, according to our criteria. There were no major complications in either group. Mortality after implantation of the IVC-F was 35% (6/17) in group A and 16% (4/25) in group B, with no significant difference (P = 0.14). Pulmonary thromboembolism recurred in 18% (3/17) of group A patients but in no group B patients (P = 0.10). All recurrences resulted in death. The 14 patients in group B who were not given a permanent IVC-F after removal of the temporary IVC-F survived. The temporary IVC-F can be used safely in patients with venous thromboembolism and is efficacious in preventing recurrence of PTE. Prognosis after removal of the temporary IVC-F is excellent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.