Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16862437›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2006

Parental suspicion of hearing loss in children with otitis media with effusion.

Phoebe S Y Lo, Michael C F Tong, Eric M C Wong, C Andrew van Hasselt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for otitis media in Asian and Western countries with consideration of updates: A narrative review.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Standardized Protocol for Maximum Repetition Rate Assessment in Children.Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP) · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Are parents aware of their children's hearing complaints?Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology · 2012
    Article
  9. Universal newborn hearing screening.Paediatrics & child health · 2011
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Phoebe S Y LoDivision of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgery and Institute of Human Communicative Research, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China. sylo@cuhk.edu.hk
Michael C F Tong
Eric M C Wong
C Andrew van Hasselt
Chinese University of Hong Kong · CNPrince of Wales Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the parental suspicion of hearing loss in children with otitis media with effusion (OME). As part of a population-based survey in a screening programme among 6- to 7-year-old Chinese children in Hong Kong, OME cases and controls were studied for the value of parental observations in the prediction of OME and hearing test results. SUBJECTS AND

methodsPrior to the otoscopic and tympanometric examination of the children on school premises, a self-administered binary-choice question was sent to the parents asking whether there was any suspicion of hearing impairment. Positive screens and randomly selected negative screens were seen in a hospital clinic for the confirmation of case and control status 2 to 3 weeks after the school screening. Aural examination under microscopy, repeated tympanometry and stapedial reflex testing, and pure-tone audiometry (PTA) were conducted, and 117 cases and 159 controls were included in this study.

resultsThe average PTA conductive threshold levels in the individual children with OME ranged from 3.8 dB to 40.0 dB with a group mean of 17.0 dB in the better-hearing ears. Parental suspicion of hearing deficit was significantly associated with OME (p<0.001) but not PTA findings (p=0.686). The sensitivity of parent-suspected hearing impairment to detect OME however was very low (19.7%). DISCUSSION: In other words, if we had relied on parental suspicion as the first screening, at least 80% of the OME cases would have been missed. We conclude that the parental suspicion of hearing loss is inadequate for the identification of mild hearing loss as caused by OME. Health education is recommended to improve parental awareness of the disease.

Indexed as

ParentsAuditory ThresholdCase-Control StudiesChildFemaleHearing Loss, ConductiveHearing TestsHong KongHumansMaleOtitis Media with EffusionOtoscopyPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID16862437
OpenAlexW1986176036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.