Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16862175›Full record

ArticleOncogene2007

Relationship between E1A binding to cellular proteins, c-myc activation and S-phase induction.

S Baluchamy, N Sankar, A Navaraj, E Moran, B Thimmapaya

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Enhanced estrogen-induced proliferation in obese rat endometrium.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2009
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Adenovirus E1A targets p400 to induce the cellular oncoprotein Myc.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S BaluchamyDepartment of Microbiology-Immunology Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
N Sankar
A Navaraj
E Moran
B Thimmapaya
Northwestern University · USTemple University · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

FUNCTIONS OF AN EIA-ASSOCIATED CELLULAR PROTEINR01CA074403 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI THIMMAPAYA, BAYAR · 1998 to 2010
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS CA74403NCI NIH HHS R01 CA074403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We recently showed that p300/CREB-binding protein (CBP) plays an important role in maintaining cells in G0/G1 phase by keeping c-myc in a repressed state. Consistent with this, adenovirus E1A oncoprotein induces c-myc in a p300-dependent manner, and the c-myc induction is linked to S-phase induction. The induction of S phase by E1A is dependent on its binding to and inactivating several host proteins including p300/CBP. To determine whether there is a correlation between the host proteins binding to the N-terminal region of E1A, activation of c-myc and induction of S phase, we assayed the c-myc and S-phase induction in quiescent human cells by infecting them with Ad N-terminal E1A mutants with mutations that specifically affect binding to different chromatin-associated proteins including pRb, p300, p400 and p300/CBP-associated factor (PCAF). We show that the mutants that failed to bind to p300 or pRb were severely defective for c-myc and S-phase induction. The induction of c-myc and S phase was only moderately affected when E1A failed to bind to p400. Furthermore, analysis of the E1A mutants that fail to bind to p300, and both p300 and PCAF suggests that PCAF may also play a role in c-myc repression, and that the two chromatin-associated proteins may repress c-myc independently. In summary, these results suggest that c-myc deregulation by E1A through its interaction with these chromatin-associated proteins is an important step in the E1A-mediated cell cycle deregulation and possibly in cell transformation.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationS PhaseAdenovirus E1A ProteinsCell CycleCell Cycle ProteinsCells, CulturedChromatinE1A-Associated p300 ProteinHistone AcetyltransferasesHumansJNK Mitogen-Activated Protein KinasesMutationp300-CBP-Associated Factorp300-CBP Transcription FactorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycRetinoblastoma ProteinAdenovirus E1A ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsChromatinE1A-Associated p300 ProteinEP300 protein, humanHistone AcetyltransferasesJNK Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinasesp300-CBP-Associated Factorp300-CBP Transcription FactorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycRetinoblastoma ProteinTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID16862175
OpenAlexW2069726454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.