Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16861281›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2006

Modeling the size distribution of focal adhesions.

Nir S Gov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cell spreading area regulates clathrin-coated pit dynamics on micropatterned substrate.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2015
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Unraveling the determinants of protrusion formation.International journal of cell biology · 2012
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Physical model for the width distribution of axons.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2009
    Article
  17. Thickness distribution of actin bundles in vitro.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nir S GovDepartment of Chemical Physics, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. nirgov@wisemail.weizmann.ac.il

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We calculate the size distribution of two-dimensional aggregates, for different simple dynamical growth models. The resulting size distributions of these domains, at steady state, are shown to depend strongly on the mode of domain growth. We then compare to the measured size-distribution of focal-adhesion domains. Using our calculation and the measured exponential distribution of focal-adhesion domain lengths can be used to test the validity of recent models proposed to describe the dynamics of these complexes in adhering cells.

Indexed as

Focal AdhesionsModels, BiologicalCell AdhesionComputer Simulation

Identifiers

PMID16861281
PMCPMC1578473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.