ArticleDer Pathologe2006
[Flat epithelial neoplasia and other columnar cell lesions of the breast].
Article in Der Pathologe, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Clonal association of flat epithelial atypia and tubular breast cancer].Der Pathologe · 2008Article
- Are columnar cell lesions the earliest histologically detectable non-obligate precursor of breast cancer?Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Columnar cell lesions are being increasingly identified in specimens excised for mammographically suspect microcalcifications. The entity of flat epithelial neoplasia remains a challenge for surgical pathologists due to its uncertain biological and clinical significance, inconsistent nomenclature, lack of prognostic data and the often unobtrusive and easily overlooked histological findings. This review aims to summarize our experience and the currently available literature on this topic, and will lead to a better understanding of this lesion. Because of its putative role as a precursor lesion and its many similarities to atypical ductal hyperplasia or ductal carcinoma in situ, differentiation from these lesions on the one hand and from columnar cell lesions without atypia on the other, is of importance and should result in different therapeutic recommendations depending on its presence in excisional or core needle biopsies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16858557What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.