Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16857403›Full record

Trial reportJournal of feline medicine and surgery2006

Evaluation of a novel immunotherapy for treatment of chronic rhinitis in cats.

Julia K Veir, Michael R Lappin, Steven W Dow

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Molecular diagnostic assays for infectious diseases in cats.The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice · 2010
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Liposome-nucleic acid immunotherapeutics.Expert opinion on drug delivery · 2008
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julia K VeirDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO 80523, USA. jveir@colostate.edu
Michael R Lappin
Steven W Dow
Colorado State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pathogenesis of chronic rhinitis in cats is poorly understood and consistently effective therapies are not currently available. Therefore, randomized clinical trials were conducted to evaluate a novel immunotherapy for treatment of chronic rhinitis in adult (n=12) and young cats (n=28). In addition, cytokine profiles in cats with chronic rhinitis were compared to those of healthy cats. Cats were treated with a potent stimulator of innate immunity (liposome-IL-2 DNA complexes) and the effects of treatment on clinical signs and immune function were assessed. In adult cats with chronic rhinitis, immunotherapy led to significant improvement in frequency of sneezing but not in other clinical signs when compared to the placebo group, whereas immunotherapy failed to improve clinical signs in younger cats. Analysis of cytokine expression in cats with rhinitis did not reveal evidence of a Th2 cytokine bias in cats with rhinitis. We conclude that chronic rhinitis in cats is not a Th2-biased disease and that immunotherapy may lead to clinical improvement in adult cats with the disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsCat DiseasesCatsChronic DiseaseDNADose-Response Relationship, ImmunologicEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleFlow CytometryImmunotherapyInterleukin-2LiposomesMaleRhinitisTreatment OutcomeDNAInterleukin-2Liposomes

Identifiers

PMID16857403
PMCPMC10832926
OpenAlexW2158286778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.