SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006
Opioids for neuropathic pain.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pain care for patients with epidermolysis bullosa: best care practice guidelines.BMC medicine · 2014Guideline
- Pooled it
- Opioids for neuropathic pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Interventions for treating pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Methadone for chronic non-cancer pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Introduction of a self-report version of the Prescription Drug Use Questionnaire and relationship to medication agreement noncompliance.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2008Trial
- Morphine versus mexiletine for treatment of postamputation pain: a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial.Anesthesiology · 2008Trial
- Neuropathic Pain: Mapping the miRNA Landscape.Non-coding RNA · 2026Review
- Electroacupuncture alleviates central post-stroke pain in rats by modulating miR-21-5p/TGF-β/Smads pathway.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
- Therapeutic Potential of Polyphenols in the Management of Diabetic Neuropathy.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021Review
- Basic Opioid Pharmacology - An Update.British journal of pain · 2020Article
- Polyphenols for diabetes associated neuropathy: Pharmacological targets and clinical perspective.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2019Review
- Modulation of the Negative Affective Dimension of Pain: Focus on Selected Neuropeptidergic System Contributions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Article
- Article
- Evaluation of Quality of Life and Satisfaction of Patients with Neuropathic Pain and Breakthrough Pain: Economic Impact Based on Quality of Life.Pain research and treatment · 2018Article
- Severe chronic pain following spinal cord damage: a pragmatic perspective for prescribing opioids.Spinal cord series and cases · 2018Review
- A Rare Case of T1-2 Thoracic Disc Herniation Mimicking Cervical Radiculopathy.International journal of spine surgery · 2017Article
- Adoptive transfer of M2 macrophages reduces neuropathic pain via opioid peptides.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2016Article
- Evaluation and Management of SCI-Associated Pain.Current pain and headache reports · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe use of opioids for neuropathic pain remains controversial. Studies have been small, have yielded equivocal results, and have not established the long-term risk-benefit ratio of this treatment.
objectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of opioid agonists for the treatment of neuropathic pain. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2nd Quarter 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to June 2005), and EMBASE (1980 to 2005 Week 27) for articles in any language, and reference lists of reviews and retrieved articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Trials were included in which opioid agonists were given to treat central or peripheral neuropathic pain of any etiology, pain was assessed using validated instruments, and adverse events were reported. Studies in which drugs other than opioid agonists were combined with opioids or opioids were administered epidurally or intrathecally were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted by two independent investigators and included demographic variables, diagnoses, interventions, efficacy, and adverse effects. MAIN
resultsTwenty-three trials met the inclusion criteria and were classified as short-term (less than 24 hours; n = 14) or intermediate-term (median = 28 days; range = eight to 70 days; n = 9). The short-term trials had contradictory results. In contrast all nine intermediate-term trials demonstrated opioid efficacy for spontaneous neuropathic pain. Meta-analysis of seven intermediate-term studies showed mean post-treatment visual analog scale scores of pain intensity after opioids to be 13 points lower on a scale from zero to 100 than after placebo (95% confidence interval -16 to -9; P < 0.00001). The most common adverse events were nausea (33% opioid versus 9% control: number needed to treat to harm (NNH) 4.2) and constipation (33% opioid versus 10% control: NNH 4.2), followed by drowsiness (29% opioid versus 12% control: NNH 6.2), dizziness (21% opioid versus 6% control: NNH 7.1), and vomiting (15% opioid versus 3% control: NNH 8.3). Where reported, 23 (11%) of 212 participants withdrew because of adverse events during opioid therapy versus nine (4%) of 202 receiving placebo. AUTHORS'
conclusionsShort-term studies provide only equivocal evidence regarding the efficacy of opioids in reducing the intensity of neuropathic pain, whereas intermediate-term studies demonstrate significant efficacy of opioids over placebo, which is likely to be clinically important. Reported adverse events of opioids are common but not life threatening. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to establish long-term efficacy, safety (including addiction potential), and effects on quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.