Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16856109›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006

Haemostatic drug therapies for acute primary intracerebral haemorrhage.

H You, R Al-Shahi

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Haemostatic therapies for acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Use of recombinant factor VIIa for the prevention and treatment of bleeding in patients without hemophilia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2011
    Pooled it
  5. Haemostatic drugs for traumatic brain injury.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

H YouGanSu Province Peoples' Hospital, Neurology and Neurosurgery, DongGang Western Road No 96, LanZhou, GanSu Province, China 730000. lzyouhonginedin@163.com
R Al-Shahi
Gansu Provincial Hospital · CNUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G108/613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBecause primary intracerebral haemorrhage (PICH) volume influences its outcome and a third of PICHs enlarge by a third within 24 hours of onset, early haemostatic drug therapy might improve outcome.

objectivesTo examine the clinical effectiveness and safety of haemostatic drug therapies for acute PICH in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) design. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched May 2006), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2006), MEDLINE (1966 to August 2005) and EMBASE (1980 to August 2005). In an effort to identify further published, ongoing and unpublished studies we scanned bibliographies of relevant articles, searched international registers of clinical trials and research, and contacted authors and pharmaceutical companies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We sought RCTs of any haemostatic drug therapy for acute PICH, compared against placebo or open control, with relevant clinical outcome measures. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently applied the inclusion criteria, reviewed the relevant studies, and extracted data from them. MAIN

resultsWe found four phase II RCTs, involving adults aged 18 years or over, within four hours of PICH: 116 received placebo and 373 participants received haemostatic drugs (two received epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) and 371 received recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa)). Haemostatic drugs appeared to reduce the risk of death or dependence on the modified Rankin Scale (grades 4 to 6) within 90 days of PICH (risk reduction 0.79 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.67 to 0.93)), but not when assessed by the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (risk reduction 0.90 (95%CI 0.81 to 1.01)). There was a statistically significant excess of arterial thromboembolism at 160 mcg/kg rFVIIa. AUTHORS'

conclusionsCurrent evidence for the use of haemostatic drugs in the treatment of acute PICH cannot provide clear guidelines for clinical practice. Adults with acute PICH may benefit from haemostatic therapy with rFVIIa, but the evidence on major clinical outcomes is neither robust nor precise. Large phase III RCTs of rFVIIa - and other less costly drugs - are necessary.

Indexed as

Aminocaproic AcidAntifibrinolytic AgentsCerebral HemorrhageFactor VIIHemostasisHemostaticsHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecombinant ProteinsAminocaproic AcidAntifibrinolytic AgentsFactor VIIHemostaticsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID16856109
OpenAlexW1563680939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.