SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006
Early versus delayed enteral nutrition support for burn injuries.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Poor methodological quality and reporting standards of systematic reviews in burn care management.International wound journal · 2017Pooled it
- Nutrition support in hospitalised adults at nutritional risk.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Nutritional support in children and young people with cancer undergoing chemotherapy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Guidelines for vocational evaluation following burns: integrated review of relevant process and factors.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2013Pooled it
- Early enteral nutrition in critically-ill patients.World journal of critical care medicine · 2025Review
- Quality indicators for hospital burn care: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- The Impact of Burn Size on Community Participation: A Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation (LIBRE) Study.Annals of surgery · 2022Article
- An investigation of early enteral nutrition provision in major burn patients in Australia and New Zealand.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2022Article
- Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary team for nutrition support in a trauma intensive care unit.Acute and critical care · 2020Article
- Is early enteral nutrition initiated within 24 hours better for the postoperative course in esophageal cancer surgery?Journal of clinical medicine research · 2014Article
- Early Enteral Nutrition for Burn Injury.Advances in wound care · 2014Review
- Enteral nutrition support in burn care: a review of current recommendations as instituted in the Ross Tilley Burn Centre.Nutrients · 2012Review
- Nutritional and pharmacological modulation of the metabolic response of severely burned patients: review of the literature (part 1).Annals of burns and fire disasters · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA burn injury increases the body's metabolic demands, and therefore nutritional requirements. Provision of an adequate supply of nutrients is believed to lower the incidence of metabolic abnormalities, thus reducing septic morbidity, improving survival rates, and decreasing hospital length of stay. Enteral nutrition support is the best feeding method for patients who are unable to achieve an adequate oral intake to maintain gastrointestinal functioning, however, its timing (i.e. early versus late) needs to be established.
objectivesTo assess the effectiveness and safety of early versus late enteral nutrition support in adults with burn injury. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, issue 1, 2006), the Cochrane Injuries Group's Specialised Register, MEDLINE (1966 to May week 1, 2006), EMBASE (1980 to week 17, 2005) and CINAHL (1982 to May week 1, 2006). SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised controlled trials comparing early enteral nutrition support (within 24 hours of injury) versus delayed enteral support (greater than 24 hours). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors used standardised forms to independently extract the data. Each trial was assessed for internal validity with differences resolved by discussion. MAIN
resultsA total of three randomised controlled trials were eligible for inclusion in this review. Results of the studies indicate that evidence about the benefit of early enteral nutritional support on standardised clinical outcomes such as length of hospital stay and mortality, remains inconclusive. Similarly, the question of whether early enteral feeding influenced or decreased metabolic rate as documented in part by our included studies, remains uncertain. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThis systematic review has not found sufficient evidence to support or refute the effectiveness of early versus late enteral nutrition support in adults with burn injury. The trials showed some promising results that would suggest early enteral nutrition support may blunt the hypermetabolic response to thermal injury, but this is insufficient to provide clear guidelines for practice. Further research incorporating larger sample sizes and rigorous methodology that utilises valid and reliable outcome measures, is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.