Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16856091›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006

Parent-initiated oral corticosteroid therapy for intermittent wheezing illnesses in children.

P Vuillermin, M South, C Robertson

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Patient- and parent-initiated oral steroids for asthma exacerbations.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Wheezing in children: Approaches to diagnosis and management.International journal of pediatrics & adolescent medicine · 2019
    Review
  7. Steroid responsiveness and wheezing phenotypes.Paediatric respiratory reviews · 2011
    Review
  8. Achieving control of asthma in preschoolers.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2010
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

P VuillerminRoyal Children's Hospital, Melbourne & Geelong Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. peter.vuillermin@telstra.com
M South
C Robertson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntermittent wheezing illnesses, which include viral associated wheeze and asthma, are amongst the most common reasons for children to present urgently to a doctor. Whether parents should commence oral corticosteroids (OCS) for an episode of acute wheeze in their child without waiting for a medical review is an important question, as the potential benefits of early oral corticosteroid intervention have to be weighed against the potential adverse effects of treatment.

objectivesThe objectives were to assess the benefits and harmful effects of parent-initiated OCS, in the management of intermittent wheezing illnesses in children, based on the results of randomised clinical trials. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register, The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, Web of Science and Dissertation Abstracts were combined (all searched November 2005). Manufacturers and researchers in the field were also contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Only randomised clinical trials studying patients aged between one and eighteen years old, with an intermittent wheezing illness (asthma, viral wheeze, preschool viral wheeze) were included. Interventions encompassed OCS at any dose or duration versus placebo or other drug combination. The trials could be unpublished or published and no language limitations were applied. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently selected trials for inclusion, assessed trial quality and extracted the data. The statistical package (RevMan 4.2) provided by the Cochrane Collaboration was used. MAIN

resultsFrom 572 original citations, a total of 2 randomised clinical trials (303 randomised participants) were included. The quality of the included trials was high; however, marked clinical heterogeneity precluded a meta-analysis. The two trials did not find evidence that parent-initiated OCS are associated with a benefit in terms of hospital admissions, unscheduled medical reviews, symptoms scores, bronchodilator use, parent and patient impressions, physician assessment, or days lost from work or school. Adverse outcomes were inadequately documented. AUTHORS'

conclusionsLimited current evidence is available and it is inconclusive regarding the benefit from parent-initiated OCS in the treatment of intermittent wheezing illnesses in children. Widespread use of this strategy cannot be recommended until the benefits and harms can be clarified further.

Indexed as

ParentsRespiratory SoundsAdministration, OralAdolescentAsthmaChildChild, PreschoolGlucocorticoidsHospitalizationHumansInfantPrednisoloneRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicGlucocorticoidsPrednisolone

Identifiers

PMID16856091
PMCPMC9019861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.