Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16856066›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006

Massage for mechanical neck disorders.

B G Haraldsson, A R Gross, C D Myers, J M Ezzo, A Morien, C Goldsmith, P M Peloso, G Bronfort, Cervical Overview Group

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02313480 (Does the Addition of Massage to Manual Therapy and Exercise Improve Outcome in Chronic Neck Pain?), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02313480 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Does the Addition of Massage to Manual Therapy and Exercise Improve Outcome in Chronic Neck Pain?

TypeinterventionalSponsorSociety of Musculoskeletal MedicineRan2013 to 2013Enrolled39ConditionsNeck PainArmsmassage
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Massage for neck pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Massage for Pain: An Evidence Map.Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. WITHDRAWN: Acupuncture for neck disorders.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Massage for low-back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Exploring the nature of therapeutic massage bodywork practice.International journal of therapeutic massage & bodywork · 2013
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

B G HaraldssonNorth Surrey Massage Therapy Clinic, 201-10366 136A Street, Surrey, BC, Canada V3T 5R3. bodhigharaldsson@yahoo.ca
A R Gross
C D Myers
J M Ezzo
A Morien
C Goldsmith
P M Peloso
G Bronfort
Cervical Overview Group
Cancer Clinic · USMcMaster University · CAMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USNorthwestern Health Sciences University · USSimon Fraser University · CASurrey Memorial Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMechanical neck disorders (MND) are common, disabling and costly. Massage is a commonly used modality for the treatment of neck pain.

objectivesTo assess the effects of massage on pain, function, patient satisfaction and cost of care in adults with neck pain. To document adverse effects of treatment. SEARCH STRATEGY: Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, MANTIS, CINAHL, and ICL databases were electronically searched, without language restriction, from their inception to September 2004 SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies using random or quasi-random assignment were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently conducted citation identification, study selection, data abstraction and methodological quality assessment. Using a random-effects model, we calculated the relative risk and standardized mean difference. MAIN

resultsNineteen trials met the inclusion criteria. Overall, the methodological quality was low, with 12/19 assessed as low-quality studies. Trials could not be statistically pooled because of heterogeneity in treatment and control groups. Therefore, a levels-of-evidence approach was used to synthesize results. Assessment of the clinical applicability of the trials showed that the participant characteristics were well reported, but neither the descriptions of the massage intervention nor the credentials or experience of the massage professionals were well reported. Six trials examined massage as a stand-alone treatment. The results were inconsistent. Of the 14 trials that used massage as part of a multimodal intervention, none were designed such that the relative contribution of massage could be ascertained. Therefore, the role of massage in multimodal treatments remains unclear. AUTHORS'

conclusionsNo recommendations for practice can be made at this time because the effectiveness of massage for neck pain remains uncertain. Pilot studies are needed to characterize massage treatment (frequency, duration, number of sessions, and massage technique) and establish the optimal treatment to be used in subsequent larger trials that examine the effect of massage as either a stand-alone treatment or part of a multimodal intervention. For multimodal interventions, factorial designs are needed to determine the relative contribution of massage. Future reports of trials should improve reporting of the concealment of allocation, blinding of outcome assessor, adverse events and massage characteristics. Standards of reporting for massage interventions, similar to CONSORT, are needed. Both short- and long-term follow-up are needed.

Indexed as

HumansMassageNeck PainRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID16856066
OpenAlexW4211250500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.