Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16856058›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006

Effects of routine oral iron supplementation with or without folic acid for women during pregnancy.

J P Pena-Rosas, F E Viteri

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 186 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Daily oral iron supplementation during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Intermittent oral iron supplementation during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Daily oral iron supplementation during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  4. Zinc supplementation for improving pregnancy and infant outcome.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Daily oral iron supplementation during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  7. Intermittent oral iron supplementation during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Approaches to Address the Anemia Challenge.The Journal of nutrition · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

J P Pena-RosasU.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), International Micronutrient Malnutrition Prevention and Control Program (IMMPaCt), 4770 Buford Highway MS K25, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA. jpenarosas@cdc.gov
F E Viteri
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt has been suggested that routine intake of supplements containing iron or combination of iron and folic acid during pregnancy improves maternal health and pregnancy outcomes.

objectivesTo assess the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of routine antenatal daily or intermittent iron supplementation with or without folic acid during pregnancy on the health of mothers and newborns. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (June 2005). Additionally, we contacted relevant organizations for the identification of ongoing and unpublished studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised or quasi-randomised trials evaluating the effect of routine supplementation with iron or combination of iron and folic acid during pregnancy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We assessed trials for methodological quality using the standard Cochrane criteria. Two authors independently assessed the trials for inclusion and one author extracted data. We collected information on randomisation method, allocation concealment, blinding and loss to follow up. The primary outcomes included maternal and infant clinical and laboratory outcomes. MAIN

resultsForty trials, involving 12706 women, were included in the review. Overall, the results showed significant heterogeneity across most prespecified outcomes. Heterogeneity could not be explained by standard sensitivity analyses including quality assessment; therefore, all results were analysed assuming random-effects. Very limited information related to clinical maternal and infant outcomes was available in the included trials. The data suggest that daily antenatal iron supplementation increases haemoglobin levels in maternal blood both antenatally and postnatally. It is difficult to quantify this increase due to significant heterogeneity between the studies. Women who receive daily antenatal iron supplementation are less likely to have iron deficiency and iron-deficiency anaemia at term as defined by current cut-off values. Side-effects and haemoconcentration are more common in women who receive daily iron supplementation. No differences were evident between daily and weekly supplementation with regards to gestational anaemia; haemoconcentration during pregnancy appears less frequent with the weekly regimen. The clinical significance of hemoconcentration defined as haemoglobin greater than 130 g/L remains uncertain. AUTHORS'

conclusionsFurther studies are needed to assess the effects of routine antenatal supplementation with iron or a combination of iron and folic acid on clinically important maternal and infant outcomes.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAnemia, Iron-DeficiencyFemaleFolic AcidHumansIronPregnancyPregnancy Complications, HematologicPregnancy OutcomePrenatal CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicFolic AcidIron

Identifiers

PMID16856058
OpenAlexW1520233856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.