SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006
Caesarean section for non-medical reasons at term.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.
- Planned caesarean section for women with a twin pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Caesarean delivery and subsequent pregnancy interval: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2013Pooled it
- Planned caesarean section for women with a twin pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011Pooled it
- Techniques for caesarean section.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008Pooled it
- Caesarean section versus vaginal delivery for preventing mother to infant hepatitis C virus transmission.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006Pooled it
- Effect of comfort care combined with family participatory care during the perioperative period of cesarean section in obstetrics and gynecology.Family practice · 2025Trial
- A history of abuse and operative delivery--results from a European multi-country cohort study.PloS one · 2014Trial
- Pregnancy complications and caesarean section: a latent class analysis.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Prevalence and Impact of Urinary Incontinence at 5-10 Years After a Singleton Birth.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Health system drivers of caesarean deliveries in south Asia: a scoping review.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2025Review
- Immune Dysregulation at the Maternal-Fetal Interface Exacerbates Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in an Inflammatory Arthritis Murine Model.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- What delivery-related factors affect postpartum recovery? A systematic review.AJOG global reports · 2025Review
- Prevalence and associated factors of caesarean section delivery: analysis from the Nepal Demographic and Health Survey 2022.BMJ open · 2025Article
- 'Maternal Request' Caesarean Sections and Medical Necessity.Clinical ethics · 2023Article
- Development and Validation of Nutrition Literacy Assessment Instrument for Chinese Lactating Women: A Preliminary Study.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Preferred mode of delivery association with the body image and genital image in pregnant women - a cross-sectional study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- Stillbirth: prevention and supportive bereavement care.BMJ medicine · 2023Review
- Treatment of Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy in China with Uterine Artery Embolization-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Pregnancy complicated by neurological and neurosurgical conditions - The evidence regarding mode of delivery.Obstetric medicine · 2022Review
- Planned mode of birth after previous cesarean section: A structured review of the evidence on the associated outcomes for women and their children in high-income setting.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCaesarean section rates are progressively rising in many parts of the world. One suggested reason is increasing requests by women for caesarean section in the absence of clear medical indications, such as placenta praevia, HIV infection, contracted pelvis and, arguably, breech presentation or previous caesarean section. The reported benefits of planned caesarean section include greater safety for the baby, less pelvic floor trauma for the mother, avoidance of labour pain and convenience. The potential disadvantages, from observational studies, include increased risk of major morbidity or mortality for the mother, adverse psychological sequelae, and problems in subsequent pregnancies, including uterine scar rupture and greater risk of stillbirth and neonatal morbidity. An unbiased assessment of advantages and disadvantages would assist discussion of what has become a contentious issue in modern obstetrics.
objectivesTo assess, from randomised trials, the effects on perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality, and on maternal psychological morbidity, of planned caesarean delivery versus planned vaginal birth in women with no clear clinical indication for caesarean section. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (December 2005), MEDLINE (1974 to April 2005), EMBASE (1974 to April 2005), CINAHL (1982 to April 2005) and PsycINFO (1887 to April 2005). We also performed a manual search of the references of all retrieved articles, sought unpublished papers and abstracts submitted to international conferences and contacted expert informants. SELECTION CRITERIA: All comparisons of intention to perform caesarean section and intention for women to give birth vaginally; random allocation to treatment and control groups; adequate allocation concealment; women at term with single fetuses with cephalic presentations and no clear medical indication for caesarean section. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We identified no studies that met the inclusion criteria. MAIN
resultsThere were no included trials. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThere is no evidence from randomised controlled trials, upon which to base any practice recommendations regarding planned caesarean section for non-medical reasons at term. In the absence of trial data, there is an urgent need for a systematic review of observational studies and a synthesis of qualitative data to better assess the short- and long-term effects of caesarean section and vaginal birth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.