SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006
Angioplasty for intracranial artery stenosis.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00816166 (Phase III Study of Pharos Vitesse Neurovascular Stent System Compared to Best Medical Therapy for the Treatment of Ischemic Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase III Study of Pharos Vitesse Neurovascular Stent System Compared to Best Medical Therapy for the Treatment of Ischemic Disease
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endovascular therapy versus medical treatment for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Endovascular Therapy for Intracranial Giant Cell Arteritis : Systematic Review, Technical Considerations and the Effect of Intra-arterial Calcium Channel Blockers.Clinical neuroradiology · 2022Pooled it
- Endovascular therapy versus medical treatment for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Outcomes after stenting for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neurology · 2020Pooled it
- Multicenter Prospective Trial of Stent Placement in Patients with Symptomatic High-Grade Intracranial Stenosis.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2016Trial
- Prevalence, prognosis, and treatment of atherosclerotic intracranial stenosis in Caucasians.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2021Article
- Spanning from the West to East: An Updated Review on Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease.Aging and disease · 2017Review
- Stroke Caused by Atherosclerosis of the Major Intracranial Arteries.Circulation research · 2017Review
- Clinical Presentation, Imaging, and Management of Complications due to Neurointerventional Procedures.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2015Review
- China Angioplasty and Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Severe Stenosis (CASSISS): A new, prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial in China.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2015Article
- The challenge of stroke prevention with intracranial arterial stenosis.Current cardiology reports · 2013Review
- Trends in intracranial stenting among medicare beneficiaries in the United States, 2006-2010.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2013Article
- A Comparison of Stent Implant versus Medical Treatment for Severe Symptomatic Intracranial Stenosis: A Controlled Clinical Trial.Cerebrovascular diseases extra · 2012Article
- Stenting versus medical treatment for severe symptomatic intracranial stenosis.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2011Article
- Endovascular treatment of symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease.Frontiers in neurology · 2011Article
- Stenting for the treatment of high-grade intracranial stenoses.Journal of neurology · 2010Article
- Intracranial stenting in atherosclerotic disease-recent results and challenges to face.Neuroradiology · 2010Review
- Indications and applications of arterial stents for stroke prevention in atherosclerotic intracranial stenosis.Current cardiology reports · 2010Review
- Intracranial stenting of atherosclerotic stenoses: current status and perspectives.Klinische Neuroradiologie · 2009Review
- Treatment of symptomatic high-grade intracranial stenoses with the balloon-expandable Pharos stent: initial experience.Neuroradiology · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntracranial artery stenosis causes up to 10% of all ischaemic strokes. The rate of recurrent vascular ischaemic events is very high. Angioplasty with or without stent placement is a feasible procedure to dilate the vessel affected. However, its safety and efficacy have not been systematically studied.
objectivesTo determine the efficacy and safety of angioplasty combined with best medical treatment compared with best medical treatment alone in patients with acute ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) resulting from intracranial artery stenosis for preventing recurrent ischaemic strokes, death, and vascular events. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched March 2006). In addition we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2006), MEDLINE (1966 to March 2006), EMBASE (1980 to February 2006) and Science Citation Index (1945 to March 2006). To identify further published, unpublished and ongoing trials we searched reference lists of relevant articles and contacted authors and experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or otherwise controlled studies comparing best medical care plus angioplasty of the intracranial cerebral arteries, with or without stent placement, with best medical care alone. Studies were only included if data for clinical significant endpoints such as recurrent ischaemic stroke, haemorrhagic stroke and death were available. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors selected trials for inclusion, and independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Calculation of relative treatment effects with subgroup analysis was done if possible. MAIN
resultsNo randomised controlled trials were found. There were 79 articles of interest consisting of open-label case series with three or more cases. The safety profile of the procedure showed an overall perioperative rate of stroke of 7.9% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 5.5% to 10.4%), perioperative death of 3.4% (95% CI 2.0% to 4.8%), and perioperative stroke or death of 9.5% (95% CI 7.0% to 12.0%). No comments can be made on the effectiveness of the procedure. AUTHORS'
conclusionsAt present there is insufficient evidence to recommend angioplasty with or without stent placement in routine practice for the prevention of stroke in patients with intracranial artery stenosis. The descriptive studies show that the procedure is feasible although carries a significant morbidity and mortality risk. Evidence from randomised controlled trials is needed to assess the safety of angioplasty and its effectiveness in preventing recurrent stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.