Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16856026›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006

Interventions for trachoma trichiasis.

D Yorston, D Mabey, S Hatt, M Burton

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions for trachoma trichiasis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Epidemiology and control of trachoma: systematic review.Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH · 2010
    Pooled it
  4. Trachoma.BMJ clinical evidence · 2007
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trachoma.Lancet (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Eradicating blinding trachoma: What is working?Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society · 2010
    Article
  11. The global burden of trachoma: a review.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2009
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

D YorstonGartnavel Hospital, Tennent Institute of Ophthalmology, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow, UK G12 0YN. dhyorston@enterprise.net
D Mabey
S Hatt
M Burton
Gartnavel General Hospital · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBSt. Thomas Hospital · CAWinnMed · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrachoma is a leading cause of avoidable blindness. The World Health Organization recommends eliminating trachoma blindness by the SAFE strategy incorporating Surgery, Antibiotic treatment, Facial cleanliness and Environmental hygiene.

objectivesThis review examined the evidence for the effectiveness of different interventions for trachoma trichiasis. SEARCH STRATEGY: We identified trials from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Library (2005, Issue 3), MEDLINE (1966 to September 2005) PubMed (searched on 21-09-06; last 90 days), EMBASE (1980 to September 2005), LILACS (March 2004) and the reference lists of included studies. We also contacted authors for details of other relevant studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised trials of any intervention intended to treat trachoma trichiasis and trials comparing different methods of delivering the same intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trials. We contacted trial authors for missing data when necessary. MAIN

resultsSeven studies met the inclusion criteria. Three studies compared different surgical interventions. These trials suggest the most effective surgery is full-thickness incision of the tarsal plate and rotation of the terminal tarsal strip 180 degrees. One study showed that bilamellar rotation was more effective than unilamellar rotation but the other two studies did not. One trial found double-sided sticking plaster more effective than epilation for the immediate management of trichiasis but required frequent replacement (odds ratio (OR) 0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.00 to 0.22). Another trial found community-based surgery increased convenience for patients without increasing the risk of complications or recurrence when compared to health centres. One trial found no difference between trichiasis surgery performed by ophthalmologists and integrated eye workers (OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.83 to 2.11). A trial comparing trichiasis surgery with and without concurrent administration of azithromycin found no difference in success rates at one year (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.46). AUTHORS'

conclusionsNo trials show interventions for trichiasis prevent blindness. Certain interventions have been shown to be more effective at eliminating trichiasis. Full thickness incision of the tarsal plate and rotation of the lash-bearing lid margin through 180 degrees is probably the best technique and is preferably delivered in the community. The use of double-sided sticking plaster is more effective than epilation as a temporary measure. Surgery may be carried out by an ophthalmologist or a trained ophthalmic assistant. The addition of azithromycin treatment at the time of surgery does not appear to improve outcomes.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsChlamydia trachomatisEntropionEyelid DiseasesHair RemovalHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTrachomaAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID16856026
OpenAlexW4244843077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.