Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16856021›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006

Surgical treatment of fibroids for subfertility.

A Griffiths, A D'Angelo, N Amso

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Surgical treatment of fibroids for subfertility.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Herbal preparations for uterine fibroids.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  3. Herbal preparations for uterine fibroids.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Fibroids, infertility and laparoscopic myomectomy.Journal of gynecological endoscopy and surgery · 2011
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Factors affecting reproductive outcome following abdominal myomectomy.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A GriffithsUniversity Hospital of Wales, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK. assw21@dsl.pipex.com
A D'Angelo
N Amso
University Hospital of Wales · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFibroids are benign tumours of the uterus occurring in up to 77% of women. Fibroids have been noted to occur more frequently in women with infertility. Retrospective studies have suggested the benefit of surgically removing fibroids to increase the fertility efficacy of both natural conception and assisted conception. There are a variety of methods to surgically remove fibroids including laparotomy, laparoscopy and hysteroscopy. The relative advantages and disadvantages of these modalities in terms of fertility efficacy and side effects are unknown.

objectivesTo determine the efficacy and safety of the removal of uterine fibroids in subfertile women by laparotomy, laparoscopy or hysteroscopy when compared with expectant management or each other. The review will include also new surgical approaches as and when they are trialed. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Review Group Specialised register of controlled trials, MEDLINE (PUBMED) 1985 to 2004, EMBASE (1985 to 2004), CINAHL (1985 to 2004) and National Research Register. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which fibroids were removed via surgery for the treatment of infertility DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. MAIN

resultsOnly one randomized controlled study was included (131 women) and this was probably underpowered. There was no evidence of a difference in outcome in terms of clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate when fibroids were removed via laparotomy or laparoscopy for infertility. There were some non fertility benefits of removal via laparoscopy including shorter hospital stay, less febrile illness and a smaller drop in pre-operative haemoglobin concentration when compared to laparotomy. There were no randomised controlled studies comparing hysteroscopic removal or no intervention with other surgical modalities. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is limited evidence to suggest that there is no difference in fertility efficacy outcome if fibroids are removed via laparotomy when compared to laparoscopy. There is no good randomised controlled evidence to support hysteroscopic removal of fibroids compared to other surgical modalities for fertility efficacy.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansHysterectomyInfertility, FemaleLaparoscopyLeiomyoma

Identifiers

PMID16856021
OpenAlexW1934350736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.