Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16856008›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006

Pulmonary artery catheters for adult patients in intensive care.

S Harvey, D Young, W Brampton, A B Cooper, G Doig, W Sibbald, K Rowan

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pulmonary artery catheters for adult patients in intensive care.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Current concept of abdominal sepsis: WSES position paper.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2014
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The pulmonary artery catheter.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2012
    Review
  12. Acute lung failure.Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine · 2011
    Review
  13. The PICU perspective on monitoring hemodynamics and oxygen transport.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2011
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Safer cardiac surgery.The journal of extra-corporeal technology · 2009
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Advances in critical care for the nephrologist: hemodynamic monitoring and volume management.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2008
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

S Harvey(ICNARC) Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre, Tavistock HouseTavistock Square, London, UK WC1H 9HR. sheila.harvey@lshtm.ac.uk
D Young
W Brampton
A B Cooper
G Doig
W Sibbald
K Rowan

Funding

Department of Health 97/08/03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPulmonary artery catheterization was adopted about 30 years ago and widely disseminated without rigorous evaluation as to whether it benefited critically ill patients. The technique is used to measure cardiac output and pressures in the pulmonary circulation to guide diagnosis and treatment. Clinicians believe these data can improve patients' outcomes, even in the absence of consensus about the specific interpretation of the data.

objectivesTo assess the effect of pulmonary artery catheterization on mortality and cost of care in adult intensive care patients. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2006); MEDLINE (all records to April 2006); EMBASE (all records to April 2006); CINAHL (all records to April 2006) and reference lists of articles. We contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomized controlled trials in adults, comparing management with and without a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We screened the titles and abstracts of the electronic search results and obtained the full text of studies of possible relevance for independent review. We determined the final results of the literature search by consensus between the authors. We did not contact study authors for additional information. MAIN

resultsWe identified 12 studies. Mortality was reported as hospital, 28-day, 30-day, or intensive care unit. We considered studies of high-risk surgery patients (eight studies) and general intensive care patients (four studies) separately for the meta-analysis. The pooled odds ratio for the studies of general intensive care patients was 1.05 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87 to 1.26) and for the studies of high-risk surgery patients 0.99 (95% CI 0.73 to 1.24). Of the eight studies of high-risk surgery patients, five evaluated the effectiveness of pre-operative optimization but there was no difference in mortality when these studies were examined separately. Pulmonary artery catheterization did not affect intensive care unit (reported by 10 studies) or hospital (reported by nine studies) length of stay. Four studies, conducted in the United States, measured costs based on hospital charges billed to patients, which on average were higher in the PAC groups. AUTHORS'

conclusionsTo date, there have been two multi-centre trials of the effectiveness of PACs for managing critically ill patients admitted to intensive care, although only one was adequately powered. Efficacy studies are needed to determine optimal management protocols and patient groups who could benefit from management with a PAC.

Indexed as

AdultCatheterization, Swan-GanzCost-Benefit AnalysisCritical CareCritical IllnessHumansLength of StayRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.