SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006
Pulmonary artery catheters for adult patients in intensive care.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pulmonary artery catheters for adult patients in intensive care.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012.Intensive care medicine · 2013Guideline
- Trial
- Cardiac filling volumes versus pressures for predicting fluid responsiveness after cardiovascular surgery: the role of systolic cardiac function.Critical care (London, England) · 2011Trial
- Sepsis-Induced Cardiomyopathy: a Comprehensive Review.Current cardiology reports · 2020Review
- Perioperative cardiovascular monitoring of high-risk patients: a consensus of 12.Critical care (London, England) · 2015Review
- Current concept of abdominal sepsis: WSES position paper.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2014Article
- Haemodynamic monitoring in the intensive care unit: results from a web-based Swiss survey.BioMed research international · 2014Article
- Obituary: pulmonary artery catheter 1970 to 2013.Annals of intensive care · 2013Article
- Stroke volume determination using transcardiopulmonary thermodilution and arterial pulse contour analysis in severe aortic valve disease.Intensive care medicine · 2013Article
- The pulmonary artery catheter.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2012Review
- Acute lung failure.Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine · 2011Review
- The PICU perspective on monitoring hemodynamics and oxygen transport.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2011Article
- Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adults.Lancet (London, England) · 2010Review
- Minimally invasive monitoring of cardiac output in the cardiac surgery intensive care unit.Current heart failure reports · 2010Review
- Safer cardiac surgery.The journal of extra-corporeal technology · 2009Article
- [Haemodynamic monitoring in the perioperative phase. Available systems, practical application and clinical data].Der Anaesthesist · 2009Review
- Clinical review: Goal-directed therapy in high risk surgical patients.Critical care (London, England) · 2009Review
- Advances in critical care for the nephrologist: hemodynamic monitoring and volume management.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2008Review
- [Pulmonary artery catheter in anaesthesia and intensive care medicine].Der Anaesthesist · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPulmonary artery catheterization was adopted about 30 years ago and widely disseminated without rigorous evaluation as to whether it benefited critically ill patients. The technique is used to measure cardiac output and pressures in the pulmonary circulation to guide diagnosis and treatment. Clinicians believe these data can improve patients' outcomes, even in the absence of consensus about the specific interpretation of the data.
objectivesTo assess the effect of pulmonary artery catheterization on mortality and cost of care in adult intensive care patients. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2006); MEDLINE (all records to April 2006); EMBASE (all records to April 2006); CINAHL (all records to April 2006) and reference lists of articles. We contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomized controlled trials in adults, comparing management with and without a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We screened the titles and abstracts of the electronic search results and obtained the full text of studies of possible relevance for independent review. We determined the final results of the literature search by consensus between the authors. We did not contact study authors for additional information. MAIN
resultsWe identified 12 studies. Mortality was reported as hospital, 28-day, 30-day, or intensive care unit. We considered studies of high-risk surgery patients (eight studies) and general intensive care patients (four studies) separately for the meta-analysis. The pooled odds ratio for the studies of general intensive care patients was 1.05 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87 to 1.26) and for the studies of high-risk surgery patients 0.99 (95% CI 0.73 to 1.24). Of the eight studies of high-risk surgery patients, five evaluated the effectiveness of pre-operative optimization but there was no difference in mortality when these studies were examined separately. Pulmonary artery catheterization did not affect intensive care unit (reported by 10 studies) or hospital (reported by nine studies) length of stay. Four studies, conducted in the United States, measured costs based on hospital charges billed to patients, which on average were higher in the PAC groups. AUTHORS'
conclusionsTo date, there have been two multi-centre trials of the effectiveness of PACs for managing critically ill patients admitted to intensive care, although only one was adequately powered. Efficacy studies are needed to determine optimal management protocols and patient groups who could benefit from management with a PAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16856008What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.