Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16856000›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006

Calcitonin for metastatic bone pain.

M J Martinez-Zapata, M Roqué, P Alonso-Coello, E Català

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. WITHDRAWN: Radioisotopes for metastatic bone pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Calcitonin for metastatic bone pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Oral calcitonin.International journal of women's health · 2012
    Article
  6. Treatment of painful bone metastases.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2010
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M J Martinez-ZapataHospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, Service of Epidemiology, Sant Antoni M. Claret, 171, Barcelona, Spain 08041. mmartinezz@hsp.santpau.es
M Roqué
P Alonso-Coello
E Català
Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública · ESHospital de Sant Pau · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPain is the most frequent symptom experienced by cancer patients, its intensity dependent on the site of the tumour. Tumours that compromise bone or nervous structures due to the bone destruction process are the most painful. There are several treatments to deal with pain (and other symptoms) caused by bone metastases. The hormone, calcitonin, has the potential to relieve pain, and also retain bone density, thus reducing the risk of fractures. This review is an update of a previously published review in The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2003) on this topic.

objectivesTo assess the effectiveness of calcitonin in controlling metastatic bone pain and reducing bone complications (hypercalcemia, fractures and nerve compression) in patients with bone metastases. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic searches were performed in MEDLINE (1966 to 2005), EMBASE (1974 to 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 2, 2005), specialised registers of the Cochrane Cancer Network and of the Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Group. Registers of clinical trials in progress were also searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies were included if they were randomised, double-blind clinical trials of patients with metastatic bone pain, treated with calcitonin, where the major outcome measure was pain, assessed at four weeks or longer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Study selection and data extraction were performed by two independent review authors. Only two studies (90 patients) were eligible for inclusion in the review and therefore meta-analysis of the data was not possible. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed by imputing all missing values as adverse outcomes. MAIN

resultsOf the two small studies included in the review, one study showed a non-significant effect of calcitonin in the number of patients with total pain reduction (RR 2.50; CI 95%, 0.55 to 11.41). The second study provided no evidence that calcitonin reduced analgesia consumption (RR 1.05; CI 95%, 0.90 to 1.21) in patients with painful bone metastases. There was no evidence that calcitonin was effective in controlling complications due to bone metastases; for improving quality of life; or patients' survival. Although not statistically significant, a greater number of adverse effects were observed in the groups given calcitonin in the two included studies (RR 3.35, CI 95%, 0.72 to 15.66). AUTHORS'

conclusionsThe limited evidence currently available does not support the use of calcitonin to control pain from bone metastases. Since the last version of this review, none of the new relevant studies have provided additional information on this treatment, in contrast to other therapeutic approaches that should be considered.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsCalcitoninHumansHypercalcemiaPainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCalcitonin

Identifiers

PMID16856000
PMCPMC9676422
OpenAlexW2138257963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.