SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006
Oral or topical nasal steroids for hearing loss associated with otitis media with effusion in children.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Oral or topical nasal steroids for hearing loss associated with otitis media with effusion in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011Pooled it
- Otitis media with effusion in children.BMJ clinical evidence · 2011Pooled it
- Grommets (ventilation tubes) for hearing loss associated with otitis media with effusion in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Identification of children in the first four years of life for early treatment for otitis media with effusion.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2007Pooled it
- Montelukast versus inhaled mometasone for treatment of otitis media with effusion in children: A randomized controlled trial.Electronic physician · 2017Article
- The Efficacy of Nasal Steroids in Treatment of Otitis Media with Effusion: A Comparative Study.International archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2015Article
- Oral administration of herbal medicines for the treatment of otitis media with effusion: protocol for a systematic review.BMJ open · 2014Article
- Rationale and feasibility of intranasal delivery of drugs to the eustachian tube orifice.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2012Review
- Acute and chronic otitis media.Pediatric clinics of North America · 2009Review
- Role of nasal allergy in chronic secretory otitis media.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2009Article
- Upper respiratory tract infections (including otitis media).Pediatric clinics of North America · 2009Review
- Optimizing the management of the main acute infections in pediatric ORL: tonsillitis, sinusitis, otitis media.Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngologyReview
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOtitis media with effusion (OME) is common and may cause hearing loss with associated developmental delay. Treatment remains controversial.
objectivesTo examine evidence for or against treating children with hearing loss associated with OME with systemic or topical intranasal steroids. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library Issue 4 2005, MEDLINE (1966 to 2006), EMBASE (1974 to 2006), and the CINAHL, LILACS, Zetoc, IndMED, SAMED, KoreaMed, MEDCARIB and Cambridge Scientific Abstracts databases in January 2006. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of oral and topical intranasal steroids, either alone or in combination with another agent such as an antibiotic, were included. EXCLUSIONS: publications in abstract form only; uncontrolled, non-randomised or retrospective studies; studies reporting outcomes with ears (rather than children). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted from the published reports by the authors independently using standardised data extraction forms and methods. The methodological quality of the included studies was independently assessed by the authors as described in the Cochrane Handbook. Dichotomous results were expressed as an odds ratio using a fixed-effect model together with the 95% confidence intervals. Continuous data were analysed using the weighted mean difference in a fixed-effect model. Tests for heterogeneity between studies were performed using a Mantel-Haenszel approach. In trials with a cross-over design, post cross-over treatment data were not used. MAIN
resultsNo study prospectively documented hearing loss associated with OME prior to randomisation. Follow up was mainly short term. The odds ratio for OME persisting after short-term follow up in children treated with oral steroids compared to control was 0.22 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.63). The odds ratio for OME persisting after short-term follow up for children treated with oral steroids plus antibiotic compared to control plus antibiotic was 0.37 (95% CI 0.25 to 0.56). However, there was significant heterogeneity between studies included in the latter comparison (P < 0.01). Trends favoured steroids for most other comparisons, but confidence intervals included unity. There was no evidence of benefit for steroid treatment for OME or hearing loss associated with OME in the longer term. AUTHORS'
conclusionsBoth oral and topical intranasal steroids alone or in combination with an antibiotic lead to a quicker resolution of OME in the short term, however, there is no evidence of longer term benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.