Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16855965›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2006

Mucolytic agents for chronic bronchitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

P J Poole, P N Black

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections--full version.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2011
    Guideline
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. CFTR targeted therapies: recent advances in cystic fibrosis and possibilities in other diseases of the airways.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2020
    Review
  7. Review
  8. The recent advances of phenotypes in acute exacerbations of COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2017
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. A new approach to grading and treating COPD based on clinical phenotypes: summary of the Spanish COPD guidelines (GesEPOC).Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group · 2013
    Article
  12. Bronchiectasis.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2012
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Mucoactive therapy in COPD.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2010
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Treating COPD with PDE 4 inhibitors.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2007
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P J PooleUniversity of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand. p.poole@auckland.ac.nz
P N Black
University of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals with chronic bronchitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may suffer recurrent exacerbations with an increase in volume and/or purulence of sputum. Because of the personal and healthcare costs associated with exacerbations, any therapy that reduces the number of exacerbations is useful. There is a marked difference between countries in terms of prescribing of mucolytics depending on whether or not they are perceived to be effective.

objectivesTo assess the effects of oral mucolytics in adults with stable chronic bronchitis or COPD. SEARCH STRATEGY: We have searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register and reference lists of articles on four separate occasions, the most recent being in June 2005. This is the third major update. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials that compared oral mucolytic therapy with placebo for at least two months in adults with chronic bronchitis or COPD. Studies of people with asthma and cystic fibrosis were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One reviewer extracted data. Study authors and drug companies were contacted for missing information. MAIN

resultsTwenty six trials were included (7335 participants). Compared with placebo, there was a significant reduction in the number of exacerbations per patient with oral mucolytics (weighted mean difference (WMD) -0.05 per month, 95% confidence interval -0.05, -0.04). Using the annualised rate of exacerbations in the control patients of 2.6 per year, this is a 20% reduction. The number of days of disability also fell (WMD -0.56, 95% confidence interval -0.77, -0.35). A recent study has shown that the benefit may apply only to those patients not already receiving inhaled corticosteroids. The number of patients who remained exacerbation-free was greater in the mucolytic group (OR 2.13 (95% CI 1.86 to 2.42)). There was no difference in lung function or in adverse effects reported between the treatments. AUTHORS'

conclusionsIn subjects with chronic bronchitis or COPD, treatment with mucolytics was associated with a small reduction in acute exacerbations and a reduction in total number of days of disability. Benefit may be greater in individuals who have frequent or prolonged exacerbations, or those who are repeatedly admitted to hospital with exacerbations with COPD. They should be considered for use, through the winter months at least, in patients with moderate or severe COPD in whom inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are not prescribed.

Indexed as

AdultBronchitisChronic DiseaseExpectorantsHumansLung Diseases, ObstructiveRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicExpectorants

Identifiers

PMID16855965
OpenAlexW4254347832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.