Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16848642›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2006

The ancestral eutherian karyotype is present in Xenarthra.

Marta Svartman, Gary Stone, Roscoe Stanyon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Microchromosomes are building blocks of bird, reptile, and mammal chromosomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Reconstruction of karyotype evolution in core Glires. I. The genome homology revealed by comparative chromosome painting.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2011
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marta SvartmanComparative Molecular Cytogenetics Core, Genetics Branch, National Cancer Institute-Frederick, Frederick, Maryland, USA. svartmanm@hotmail.com
Gary Stone
Roscoe Stanyon
Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · USNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular studies have led recently to the proposal of a new super-ordinal arrangement of the 18 extant Eutherian orders. From the four proposed super-orders, Afrotheria and Xenarthra were considered the most basal. Chromosome-painting studies with human probes in these two mammalian groups are thus key in the quest to establish the ancestral Eutherian karyotype. Although a reasonable amount of chromosome-painting data with human probes have already been obtained for Afrotheria, no Xenarthra species has been thoroughly analyzed with this approach. We hybridized human chromosome probes to metaphases of species (Dasypus novemcinctus, Tamandua tetradactyla, and Choloepus hoffmanii) representing three of the four Xenarthra families. Our data allowed us to review the current hypotheses for the ancestral Eutherian karyotype, which range from 2n = 44 to 2n = 48. One of the species studied, the two-toed sloth C. hoffmanii (2n = 50), showed a chromosome complement strikingly similar to the proposed 2n = 48 ancestral Eutherian karyotype, strongly reinforcing it.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromosome BandingChromosome PaintingEvolution, MolecularHumansKaryotypingMetaphaseModels, GeneticNucleic Acid HybridizationPhylogenySpecies SpecificityXenarthra

Identifiers

PMID16848642
PMCPMC1513266
OpenAlexW2141799932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.