Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16847565›Full record

ArticleCellular & molecular biology letters2006

In-silico prediction and observations of nuclear matrix attachment.

Adrian E Platts, Amelia K Quayle, Stephen A Krawetz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular & molecular biology letters, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Relationship between DNA replication and the nuclear matrix.Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms · 2013
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adrian E PlattsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Amelia K Quayle
Stephen A Krawetz

Funding

GENETIC MECHANISMS THAT POTENTIATE HUMAN SPERMATOGENESISR01HD036512 · NICHD · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KRAWETZ, STEPHEN A · 1999 to 2009
$2.1M
NICHD NIH HHS HD-36512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nuclear matrix is a functionally adaptive structural framework interior to the nuclear envelope. The nature and function of this nuclear organizer remains the subject of widespread discussion in the epigenetic literature. To draw this discussion together with a view to suggest a way forward we summarize the biochemical evidence for the modalities of DNA-matrix binding alongside the in-silico predictions. Concordance is exhibited at various, but not all levels. On the one hand, both the reiteration and sequence similarity of some elements of Matrix Attachment Regions suggest conservation. On the other hand, in-silico predictions suggest additional unique components. In bringing together biological and sequence evidence we conclude that binding may be hierarchical in nature, reflective of a biological role in replicating, transcribing and potentiating chromatin. Nuclear matrix binding may well be more complex than the widely accepted simple loop model.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBase SequenceChromosomes, Human, Pair 6Computational BiologyDiscriminant AnalysisHumansMatrix Attachment RegionsNuclear MatrixNucleic Acid HeteroduplexesSoftwareNucleic Acid Heteroduplexes

Identifiers

PMID16847565
PMCPMC6276010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.