ReviewCNS drugs2006
[Clinical use of triptans in the management of migraine].
Review in CNS drugs, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Frovatriptan and rizatriptan economic EVAluation: the FREEVA study.The journal of headache and pain · 2013Trial
- Clinical and economic comparison of frovatriptan versus other oral triptans in the treatment of acute migraine in the real-world setting.Clinical drug investigation · 2009Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The discovery of the triptans (selective serotonin agonists 5HT(1B/1D), with 7 compounds (almotriptan, eletriptan, frovatriptan, naratriptan, rizatriptan, sumatriptan, zolmitriptan) soon available (5 in France: sumatriptan, naratriptan, eletriptan, zolmitriptan and almotriptan), was a considerable step forward in the acute treatment of migraine. Although randomized clinical studies have demonstrated their significant efficacy, triptans have still to be accepted into the clinical practice of some prescribing practitioners. Rather than attempting to highlight clinically insignificant differences between the triptans, efforts need to be focused on the optimal use of these drugs in clinical practice. This review therefore aims at answering questions related to the efficacy of triptans, recurrence of attacks after use, safety and tolerability, drug interactions and the cost of triptans in clinical use. Triptans are effective and well-tolerated drugs in the acute treatment of migraine attacks, and are the most cost-effective migraine therapy in patients with severe symptoms. Triptans should therefore be considered as first-line therapy in a stratified strategy, ensuring 'right treatment first time' for patients with severe migraine. Moreover, although very few studies have been conducted to date, clinical experience shows that a non-responder to one triptan may well benefit from another triptan, or even the same compound via a different route of administration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16841523What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.